Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30175515›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Survival trends among non-small-cell lung cancer patients over a decade: impact of initial therapy at academic centers.

Yanyan Lou, Bhagirathbhai Dholaria, Aixa Soyano, David Hodge, Jordan Cochuyt, Rami Manochakian, Stephen J Ko, Mathew Thomas, Margaret M Johnson, Neal M Patel and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis in Lung Cancer-A Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Characterization of Dyspnea in Veteran Lung Cancer Survivors Following Curative-Intent Therapy.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yanyan LouDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Bhagirathbhai DholariaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-2371-3655
Aixa SoyanoDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
David HodgeDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Jordan CochuytDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Rami ManochakianDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Stephen J KoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Mathew ThomasDepartment of Cardiovascular Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Margaret M JohnsonDivision of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Neal M PatelDivision of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Robert C MillerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Alex A AdjeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sikander AilawadhiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-8111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been rapidly advancing over the last decade. Academic centers are considered equipped with better expertise. NSCLC outcome trends in novel therapeutic era and impact of initial treatment at academic centers have not been reported.

methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was used to identify NSCLC incident cases from 2004 to 2013. Overall survival (OS) was plotted by year of diagnosis and type of initial treatment center, accounting for several factors available in NCDB.

resultsA total of 1 150 722 NSCLC patients were included and separated by initial treatment center type (academic: 31.5%; nonacademic: 68.5%). Median follow-up and OS for all patients were 11.8 months (range: 0-133.6 months) and 13.1 months (95% CI: 13.08-13.17), respectively. Median OS improved significantly for those diagnosed in 2010-2013 (14.8 months [95% CI: 14.7-14.9]) as compared to 2004-2009 (12.4 months [95% CI: 12.3-12.5]) (P < 0.001). Treatment at academic centers was associated with improved OS (multivariate HR for OS = 0.929 [95% CI: 0.92-0.94], P < 0.0010). Four-year OS for academic and nonacademic cohorts was 28.5%% and 22.1%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the difference was more pronounced in stage I to III NSCLC.

conclusionIn this largest analysis, thus far, NSCLC survival has improved over time, and type of initial treatment center significantly influences survival. Identifying and removing barriers to obtaining initial treatment of NSCLC at academic medical centers could improve OS.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIncidenceLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSurvival AnalysisTime-to-Treatmentacademic centercommunity centerNational Cancer Databasenon-small-cell lung canceroutcome disparitiestreatment center type

Identifiers

PMID30175515
PMCPMC6198232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.