Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30175445›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in a large, unselected breast cancer cohort.

Jingmei Li, Wei Xiong Wen, Martin Eklund, Anders Kvist, Mikael Eriksson, Helene Nordahl Christensen, Astrid Torstensson, Svetlana Bajalica-Lagercrantz, Alison M Dunning, Brennan Decker and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogenic variants inJournal of medicine and life · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Reclassification ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population-based germline testing ofGenetics in medicine open · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Predominance ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Jingmei LiHuman Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-7511
Wei Xiong WenCancer Research Malaysia, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Martin EklundDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anders KvistDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Mikael ErikssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helene Nordahl ChristensenAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.
Astrid TorstenssonAstraZeneca Nordic-Baltic, Södertälje, Sweden.
Svetlana Bajalica-LagercrantzDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alison M DunningCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Brennan DeckerCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jamie AllenCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Craig LuccariniCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Karen PooleyCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jacques SimardGenomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Canada Research Chair in Oncogenetics, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.
Leila DorlingCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1214-8080
Douglas F EastonCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Soo-Hwang TeoCancer Research Malaysia, Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Åke BorgDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik GrönbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
University of Cambridge · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SECancer Research Malaysia · MYLund University · SEBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAKarolinska University Hospital · SENational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16563Cancer Research UK 16565Cancer Research UK C1287/A16563Cancer Research UK C8197/A16565Intramural NIH HHS Z99 HG999999Wellcome Trust 203477/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2-driven tumors may benefit from targeted therapy. It is not clear whether current BRCA screening guidelines are effective at identifying these patients. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of inherited BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in a large, clinically representative breast cancer cohort and to estimate the proportion of BRCA1/2 carriers not detected by selectively screening individuals with the highest probability of being carriers according to current clinical guidelines. The study included 5,122 unselected Swedish breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2008. Target sequence enrichment (48.48 Fluidigm Access Arrays) and sequencing were performed (Illumina Hi-Seq 2,500 instrument, v4 chemistry). Differences in patient and tumor characteristics of BRCA1/2 carriers who were already identified as part of clinical BRCA1/2 testing routines and additional BRCA1/2 carriers found by sequencing the entire study population were compared using logistic regression models. Ninety-two of 5,099 patients with valid variant calls were identified as BRCA1/2 carriers by screening all study participants (1.8%). Only 416 study participants (8.2%) were screened as part of clinical practice, but this identified 35 out of 92 carriers (38.0%). Clinically identified carriers were younger, less likely postmenopausal and more likely to be associated with familiar ovarian cancer compared to the additional carriers identified by screening all patients. More BRCA2 (34/42, 81.0%) than BRCA1 carriers (23/50, 46%) were missed by clinical screening. In conclusion, BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence in unselected breast cancer patients was 1.8%. Six in ten BRCA carriers were not detected by selective clinical screening of individuals.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedMutationOvarian NeoplasmsPrevalenceBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2breast cancerclinical testingnext-generation sequencingpredictionscreening criteria

Identifiers

PMID30175445
PMCPMC6320715
OpenAlexW2890429581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.