Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30175318›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2017

Design and introduction of a quality of life assessment and practice support system: perspectives from palliative care settings.

Richard Sawatzky, Esther Laforest, Kara Schick-Makaroff, Kelli Stajduhar, Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham, Marian Krawczyk, Joakim Öhlén, Barbara McLeod, Neil Hilliard, Carolyn Tayler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge translation resources to support the use of quality of life assessment tools for the care of older adults living at home and their family caregivers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pilot Study to Develop and Test Palliative Care Quality Indicators for Nursing Homes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard Sawatzky1School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 Canada.
Esther Laforest3Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University, 680 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC H3A 2M7 Canada.
Kara Schick-Makaroff4Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9 Canada.
Kelli Stajduhar5School of Nursing and Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, (IALH), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2 Canada.
Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham1School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 Canada.
Marian Krawczyk1School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 7600 Glover Road, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1 Canada.
Joakim Öhlén9Center for Person-Centered Care, Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Salgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 457, 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Barbara McLeod6Palliative Care, Fraser Health, 100 - 2296 McCallum Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 3P4 Canada.
Neil Hilliard6Palliative Care, Fraser Health, 100 - 2296 McCallum Road, Abbotsford, BC V2S 3P4 Canada.
Carolyn Tayler5School of Nursing and Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, (IALH), University of Victoria, PO Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2 Canada.
S Robin Cohen11Departments of Oncology and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Fraser Health · CAMcGill University · CATrinity Western University · CAUniversity of Victoria · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Gothenburg · SEWestern University · CA

Funding

Molecular Basis of Berberine-Mediated Antitumor ActivityF05AT002014 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KANG, QUAN · 2003 to 2007
$183k
Celastrus: Immunologic Basis of Anti-Arthritic ActivityF05AT002013 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI TONG, LI · 2003 to 2006
$121k
NCCIH NIH HHS F05 AT002013NCCIH NIH HHS F05 AT002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality of life (QOL) assessment instruments, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), are increasingly promoted as a means of enabling clinicians to enhance person-centered care. However, integration of these instruments into palliative care clinical practice has been inconsistent. This study focused on the design of an electronic Quality of Life and Practice Support System (QPSS) prototype and its initial use in palliative inpatient and home care settings. Our objectives were to ascertain desired features of a QPSS prototype and the experiences of clinicians, patients, and family caregivers in regard to the initial introduction of a QPSS in palliative care, interpreting them in context.

methodsWe applied an integrated knowledge translation approach in two stages by engaging a total of 71 clinicians, 18 patients, and 17 family caregivers in palliative inpatient and home care settings. Data for Stage I were collected via 12 focus groups with clinicians to ascertain desirable features of a QPSS. Stage II involved 5 focus groups and 24 interviews with clinicians and 35 interviews with patients or family caregivers during initial implementation of a QPSS. The focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the qualitative methodology of interpretive description.

resultsDesirable features focused on hardware (lightweight, durable, and easy to disinfect), software (simple, user-friendly interface, multi-linguistic, integration with e-health systems), and choice of assessment instruments that would facilitate a holistic assessment. Although patient and family caregiver participants were predominantly enthusiastic, clinicians expressed a mixture of enthusiasm, receptivity, and concern regarding the use of a QPSS. The analyses revealed important contextual considerations, including: (a) logistical, technical, and aesthetic considerations regarding the QPSS as a technology, (b) diversity in knowledge, skills, and attitudes of clinicians, patients, and family caregivers regarding the integration of electronic QOL assessments in care, and (c) the need to understand organizational context and priorities in using QOL assessment data.

conclusionThe process of designing and integrating a QPSS in palliative care for patients with life-limiting conditions and their family caregivers is complex and requires extensive consultation with clinicians, administrators, patients, and family caregivers to inform successful implementation.

Indexed as

Family caregiversOlder adultsPalliative carePerson-centered careQuality of life assessment

Identifiers

PMID30175318
PMCPMC6104521
OpenAlexW2888235431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.