ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2017
Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Patient reported outcomes in oncology: changing perspectives-a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Pooled it
- Remote symptom monitoring integrated into electronic health records: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- From framework to practice: applying the proteus-practice framework to learn lessons for integrating PROs in clinical care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Patient education on PROM completion in clinical care settings: a scoping review.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Reliability and Construct Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- The relationship among patient reported outcome measure scores with health care costs and inpatient admission: results from Utah mEVAL and value driven outcomes.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Observational
- Individualized Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures As a Communication Aid in Outpatient Cardiology Care: A Study Protocol.CJC open · 2025Article
- Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Care-Analyzing Routinely Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes. A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Difference for PROMIS Physical Function Improvement After Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.Advances in patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Associations of Pretransplant Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Score With Kidney Transplant Outcomes.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
- The association of diabetes mellitus and routinely collected patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer. A real-world cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Sex Differences in Patient-Reported Depression Following Vascular Surgery Procedures.The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- APPROACH e-PROM system: a user-centered development and evaluation of an electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system for management of coronary artery disease.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of same day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: Clinical, cost, and patient reported outcomes.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2024Article
- Long-term patient-reported outcomes among patients undergoing revascularization vs medical therapy for intermittent claudication.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- Linking QuickDASH and PROMIS Upper-Extremity Computer-Adaptive Test Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study.The Journal of hand surgery · 2024Article
- Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Seamless Integration of Computer-Adaptive Patient Reported Outcomes into an Electronic Health Record.Applied clinical informatics · 2024Article
- Development and Psychometric Validation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs BCC-20) for Assessing Comfort during Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) have traditionally been implemented through a manual process of paper and pencil with little standardization throughout a Healthcare System. Each practice has asked patients specific questions to understand the patient's health as it pertains to their specialty. These data were rarely shared and there has not been a comparison of patient's health across different specialty domains. We sought to leverage interoperable electronic systems to provide a standardization of PRO assessments across sites of care.
methodsUniversity of Utah Health is comprised of four hospitals, 12 community clinics, over 400,000 unique annual patients, and more than 5000 providers. The enterprise wide implementation of PROs started in November of 2015. Patients can complete an assessment at home via email, or within the clinic on a tablet. Each specialty has the opportunity to add additional specialty-specific instruments. We customized the interval with which the patient answers the assessments based on specialty preference in order to minimize patient burden, while maximizing relevant data for clinicians.
resultsBarriers and facilitators were identified in three phases: Pre-implementation, Implementation, and Post-implementation. Each phase was further broken down into technical challenges, content inclusion and exclusion, and organizational strategy. These phases are unique and require collaboration between several groups throughout the organization with support from executive leadership. DISCUSSION: We are deploying system-wide standard and customized PRO collection with the goals of providing better patient care, improving physician-patient communication, and ultimately improving the value of the care given. Standardized assessment provides any clinician with information to quickly evaluate the overall, physical and mental health of a patient. This information is available real time to aid in patient communication for the clinician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.