ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2018
Recurrent colon perforation after discontinuation of bevacizumab for ovarian cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extreme complications related to bevacizumab use in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a case series from a III level referral centre and review of the literature.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bevacizumab (Bev) is an antiangiogenic drug used to treat various malignances, including ovarian cancer (OC). Bev is generally well-tolerated; however, it has a characteristic toxicity profile. In particular, gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a rare but serious side effect that can be lethal. A 55-year-old woman with recurrent OC had an episode of GIP during third-line chemotherapy comprising Bev and topotecan (TPT). Bev was discontinued while TPT was continued as monotherapy. Three months after discontinuation of Bev, the patient presented with left lower abdominal pain and was diagnosed with a second GIP. She had emergent surgery. One year later, she is still alive and healthy, and is continuing TPT. This is the first report of recurrent GIP after discontinuation of Bev. Our case suggests that physicians should be aware of GIP even after the discontinuation of Bev.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.