Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30175173›Full record

ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2018

Ethical Issues in Technological Disaster: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Ali Khaji, Bagher Larijani, Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi, Mohammad A Mohagheghi, Hammid R Khankeh, Soheil Saadat, Seyed Mahmoud Tabatabaei, Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali KhajiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bagher LarijaniMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mohammad GhodsiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad A MohagheghiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hammid R KhankehMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Soheil SaadatMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mahmoud TabatabaeiMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Davoud Khorasani-ZavarehMedical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Karolinska Institutet · SEShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndustrialization could bring risk of Technological Disaster (TD) such as happened in Chernobyl, Bhopal and Fukushima crisis. Little has been discussed about its related ethical issues. In this study, we aimed to investigate ethical issues have been stated for technological disasters.

methodsA systematic search was conducted on the main international literature databases including Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and ISI (Jan 1, 2000 to Jan 1, 2018). From 64articles were eligible for investigation of ethical issues in Natural disaster, 6 was related to Technological Disaster. The articles were in English language.

resultsOur result show that there are seven articles discussing ethical issues during Technological disaster. All of them are related to nuclear crisis in Fukushima resulting from Japan tsunami 2011. These articles discussed mainly three ethical issues in providing medical care to victims of Technological Disasters as follow: 1- Duty of care 2- Mandatory evacuationand3- Resource Allocation.

conclusionVictim health is the main factor for making decision and implementation of any programs during response to disasters. Mandatory Evacuation for reasons other than providing health to people (such as: maintain public order) and if bring health risk to people will be unjustified. Duty of health workers for providing care is based on General beneficence meanwhile it is necessary to provide facilities to protect them from dangers that treat them in the field. For act ethically, Health workers must have adequate preparedness for response to T-D meanwhile it is necessary to provide guidelines for individuals that participation in relief operation. It is necessary to discuss more about Technological Disaster Ethics especially in industrial countries and where there is especial industrial with potential of huge crises.

Indexed as

Duty of careMandatory evacuationMedical EthicsResource AllocationSystematic reviewTechnological-disaster

Identifiers

PMID30175173
PMCPMC6110427
OpenAlexW2793785247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.