ArticleFrontiers in medicine2018
EUPATI and Patients in Medicines Research and Development: Guidance for Patient Involvement in Regulatory Processes.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Queer Science and Scientists Are Shaping the Future of Immunology.European journal of immunology · 2026Article
- Ethical and Regulatory Awareness of Clinical Trials: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study from Poland.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the methodology of independent Community Advisory Boards in health products research and development: a mixed-methods cross-sectional survey study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Review
- Barriers and solutions for healthcare professionals to involve patients as partners in oncology research: Project RISE.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Incorporating Patient Needs and Perspectives in Additional Risk Minimization Measures and Other Pharmacovigilance Deliverables - A Framework and Implementation Roadmap.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Article
- Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Seven Actions Towards Advancing Patient Authorship and Collaboration in Peer-Reviewed Publications.The patient · 2025Review
- Widening Patient Engagement for Rare Disease Drug Trials: The Perspectives of Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis on Participating in Clinical Drug Trials and Drug Trial Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Patient engagement for the development of equity-focused health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations: a case study of two Canadian HTA organizations.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Best practices for the collection and analysis of patient experience data from social media for patient-focused drug development.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Research Priorities to Increase Confidence in and Acceptance of Health Preference Research: What Questions Should be Prioritized Now?The patient · 2024Article
- From Innovator Result-driven to Multi-actor Impact-oriented Public-Private Partnerships: Integrating the Patient Perspective.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024Review
- Blended e-learning and certification for medicines development professionals: results of a 7-year collaboration between King's College, London and the GMDP Academy, New York.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Patient listening on social media for patient-focused drug development: a synthesis of considerations from patients, industry and regulators.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Engaging children and adolescents in the design and conduct of paediatric research.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Young patients' involvement in a composite endpoint method development on acceptability for paediatric oral dosage forms.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance and merits of greater patient involvement in medicines research and development (R&D) are commonly acknowledged and is thought to offer benefits for all involved parties. It improves discovery, development, and evaluation of new effective medicines, based, among others, on the collaborative identification and understanding of unmet needs, research priorities, optimization of clinical study design, as well as incorporating patient views in regulatory activities. It fosters increased transparency, trust and mutual respect between patients and other stakeholders and applies to all stages of medicines R&D, inclusive of regulation and licensing of medicines and appraisal by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. In order to be effective and beneficial for all stakeholders, patient engagement as an integral part of medicines R&D needs clear and mutually agreed rules. Existing codes of practice for patient involvement do not comprehensively cover the full scope of patient engagement in all processes related to R&D. One specific aim of the European Patients' Academy on Therapeutic Innovation (EUPATI) was to close this gap through the development of guidance documents for pharmaceutical industry-led medicines R&D, ethics committees, regulatory authorities and health technology assessment (HTA). The guidance in this article covers patient involvement in the regulatory field and draws on the mature "Framework for interaction between the European Medicines Agency and patients and consumers and their organizations." It expands on the EMA framework, specifically including National Competent Authorities (NCAs). It sets out objectives for patient involvement in medicines regulation and recommends concrete suggested working practices. It is primarily aimed at regulatory authorities wishing to interact with patients or their organizations in their activities but should also be considered by patients/patient organizations planning to collaborate with regulatory authorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.