ReviewCureus2018
Assessment of Treatment Response Following Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization of Liver Malignancies.
Review in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Review
- The Deterioration of Sarcopenia Post-Transarterial Radioembolization with Holmium-166 Serves as a Predictor for Disease Progression at 3 Months in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Maximum tumor-absorbed dose measured by voxel-based multicompartmental dosimetry as a response predictor in yttrium-90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Article
- Critical review of HCC imaging in the multidisciplinary setting: treatment allocation and evaluation of response.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Review
- Classification of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on multi-phase CT scans.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- MRI Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Local-Regional Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization using yttrium-90 microspheres is an established and effective treatment for liver malignancies. Determining response to this treatment is difficult due to the radical changes that occur in tissue as a response to radiation. Though accurate assessment of treatment response is paramount for proper patient disposition, there is currently no standardized assessment protocol. Current methods of assessment often consider changes in size, necrosis, vascularity, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography FDG-PET metabolic activity, and diffusion using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI). Current methods of assessment require a lag time of one to two months post-treatment to determine treatment effectiveness. This delay is a hindrance to obtaining better patient outcomes, giving rise to a need to identify markers for faster determination of treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.