ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
ctDNA assessment of EGFR mutation status in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in real-world setting.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02623257 (A Diagnostic Study to Determine the Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Assessed With Circulating Tumor DNA Samples in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Diagnostic Study to Determine the Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations Assessed With Circulating Tumor DNA Samples in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical applications of circulating biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- CirculatingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Correlation between circulating tumor DNA and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Smoking habit and chemo-radiotherapy and/or surgery affect the sensitivity of EGFR plasma test in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC research notes · 2020Article
- An updated review of the H19 lncRNA in human cancer: molecular mechanism and diagnostic and therapeutic importance.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Cell Free Tumoral DNA Versus Paraffin Block Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Detection in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Observational
- Utilization of Archived Plasma to Detect Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of EGFR mutations in circulating free tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) was still unknown in China. This large-scale study (NCT02623257) aimed to explore the prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and determine the correlation of EGFR mutation status with clinical characteristics.
methodsPlasma DNA samples from 1,001 patients with stage III/IV NSCLC who received ≤1st line chemotherapy were collected from 65 hospitals. EGFR mutations were tested by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) method. The EGFR mutation rate was calculated and the associations between EGFR status and patients' demographic data, disease status as well as treatment pattern were explored.
resultsEGFR mutations were detected in 251 of 1,001 (25.1%) patients, 26.8% in adenocarcinoma and 11.7% in squamous carcinoma. A total of 189 harbored sensitizing mutations alone, 28 had resistance mutations alone, 3 had a combination of activating mutations, and 31 had a combination of activating and resistance mutations. Higher detection rate was observed in chemotherapy-naïve patients than those received 1st line chemotherapy (27.0%
conclusionsctDNA based EGFR mutation test is feasible and could be a surrogate when tissue biopsy is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.