ArticleOncotarget2018
Combinatorial engineering of N-TIMP2 variants that selectively inhibit MMP9 and MMP14 function in the cell.
Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic potential of inhibitors of gelatinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 for the treatment of breast cancer.The FEBS journal · 2026Review
- Modifying inhibitor specificity for homologous enzymes by machine learning.The FEBS journal · 2026Article
- Matrix metalloproteinase-driven epithelial-mesenchymal transition: implications in health and disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Deep neural networks for predicting the affinity landscape of protein-protein interactions.iScience · 2024Article
- Computational design of matrix metalloprotenaise-9 (MMP-9) resistant to auto-cleavage.The Biochemical journal · 2023Article
- Designed Loop Extension Followed by Combinatorial Screening Confers High Specificity to a Broad Matrix MetalloproteinaseInhibitor.Journal of molecular biology · 2023Article
- Computational design of Matrix Metalloprotenaise-9 (MMP-9) resistant to auto-cleavage.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Structure and computation-guided yeast surface display for the evolution of TIMP-based matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- The Repertoire of Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteases: Evolution, Regulation of Extracellular Matrix Proteolysis, Engineering and Therapeutic Challenges.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Unravelling the distinct biological functions and potential therapeutic applications of TIMP2 in cancer.Carcinogenesis · 2022Review
- Digestive Inflammation: Role of Proteolytic Dysregulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Quantitative mapping of binding specificity landscapes for homologous targets by using a high-throughput method.The Biochemical journal · 2020Article
- Review
- Directed evolution of the metalloproteinase inhibitor TIMP-1 reveals that its N- and C-terminal domains cooperate in matrix metalloproteinase recognition.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- The impact of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in patients with chronic glaucoma - a literature review.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Developing selective inhibitors for proteolytic enzymes that share high sequence homology and structural similarity is important for achieving high target affinity and functional specificity. Here, we used a combination of yeast surface display and dual-color selective library screening to obtain selective inhibitors for each of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) MMP14 and MMP9 by modifying the non-specific N-terminal domain of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (N-TIMP2). We generated inhibitor variants with 30- to 1175-fold improved specificity to each of the proteases, respectively, relative to wild type N-TIMP2. These biochemical results accurately predicted the selectivity and specificity obtained in cell-based assays. In U87MG cells, the activation of MMP2 by MMP14 was inhibited by MMP14-selective blockers but not MMP9-specific inhibitors. Target specificity was also demonstrated in MCF-7 cells stably expressing either MMP14 or MMP9, with only the MMP14-specific inhibitors preventing the mobility of MMP14-expressing cells. Similarly, the mobility of MMP9-expressing cells was inhibited by the MMP9-specific inhibitors, yet was not altered by the MMP14-specific inhibitors. The strategy developed in this study for improving the specificity of an otherwise broad-spectrum inhibitor will likely enhance our understanding of the basis for target specificity of inhibitors to proteolytic enzymes, in general, and to MMPs, in particular. We, moreover, envision that this study could serve as a platform for the development of next-generation, target-specific therapeutic agents. Finally, our methodology can be extended to other classes of proteolytic enzymes and other important target proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.