Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174764›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2018

Individualized metabolic profiling stratifies pancreatic and biliary tract cancer: a useful tool for innovative screening programs and predictive strategies in healthcare.

Jun Hwa Lee, Seung Eun Yu, Kyung-Hee Kim, Myung Hyun Yu, In-Hye Jeong, Jae Youl Cho, Sang-Jae Park, Woo Jin Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Tae Hyun Kim and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Metabolic rearrangements in primary liver cancers: cause and consequences.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun Hwa Lee *1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Seung Eun Yu *1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Hee Kim *1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Myung Hyun Yu1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
In-Hye Jeong1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Jae Youl Cho3Department of Genetic Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419 Republic of Korea.
Sang-Jae Park4Center for Liver Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Woo Jin Lee4Center for Liver Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Sung-Sik Han4Center for Liver Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Tae Hyun Kim4Center for Liver Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Eun Kyung Hong4Center for Liver Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Sang Myung Woo1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.
Byong Chul Yoo1Biomarker Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, 10408 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7937-0167
National Cancer Center · USSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer (PC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) are highly aggressive cancers, characterized by their rarity, difficulty in diagnosis, and overall poor prognosis. Diagnosis of PC and BTC is complex and is made using a combination of appropriate clinical suspicion, imaging and endoscopic techniques, and cytopathological examination. However, the late-stage detection and poor prognosis of this tumor have led to an urgent need for biomarkers for early and/or predictive diagnosis and improved personalized treatments. WORKING HYPOTHESIS: There are two hypotheses for focusing on low-mass metabolites in the blood. First, valuable information can be obtained from the masses and relative amounts of such metabolites, which present as low-mass ions (LMIs) in mass spectra. Second, metabolic profiling of individuals may provide important information regarding biological changes in disease states that is useful for the early diagnosis of PC and BTC. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo assess whether profiling metabolites in serum can serve as a non-invasive screening tool for PC and BTC, 320 serum samples were obtained from patients with PC ( RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe levels of the 14 discriminative LMIs were higher in the PC and BTC groups than in the control, CRC and OVC groups, but only two LMIs discriminated between PC and BTC: lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) (16:0) and LysoPC(20:4). The levels of these two LysoPCs were also slightly lower in the PC/BTC/CRC/OVC groups compared with the control group. Taken together, the data showed that metabolic profiling can precisely denote the status of cancer, and, thus, could be useful for screening. This study not only details efficient methods to identify discriminative LMIs for cancer screening but also provides an example of metabolic profiling for distinguishing PC from BTC. Furthermore, the two metabolites [LysoPC(16:0), LysoPC(20:4)] shown to discriminate these diseases are potentially useful when combined with other, previously identified protein or metabolic biomarkers for predictive, preventive and personalized medical approach.

Indexed as

Biliary tract cancerBioinformaticsBiomarkersMetabolomicsPancreatic cancerPredictive preventive personalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID30174764
PMCPMC6107458
OpenAlexW2887484595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.