Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174738›Full record

ArticleSustainability science2016

Population dynamics, delta vulnerability and environmental change: comparison of the Mekong, Ganges-Brahmaputra and Amazon delta regions.

Sylvia Szabo, Eduardo Brondizio, Fabrice G Renaud, Scott Hetrick, Robert J Nicholls, Zoe Matthews, Zachary Tessler, Alejandro Tejedor, Zita Sebesvari, Efi Foufoula-Georgiou and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sustainability science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Entropy and optimality in river deltas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Sounding the Alarm: Health in the Anthropocene.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sylvia SzaboDivision of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Eduardo BrondizioDepartment of Anthropology, The Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change and the Ostrom Workshop-Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Fabrice G RenaudUnited Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany.
Scott HetrickDepartment of Anthropology, The Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change and the Ostrom Workshop-Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
Robert J NichollsEngineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Zoe MatthewsDivision of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Zachary TesslerEnvironmental CrossRoads Initiative, City University of New York, New York, USA.
Alejandro TejedorCivil, Environmental and Geo-Engineering and National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Zita SebesvariUnited Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn, Germany.
Efi Foufoula-GeorgiouCivil, Environmental and Geo-Engineering and National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Sandra da CostaInstituto de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP), São José dos Campos, Brazil.
John A DearingGeography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropical delta regions are at risk of multiple threats including relative sea level rise and human alterations, making them more and more vulnerable to extreme floods, storms, surges, salinity intrusion, and other hazards which could also increase in magnitude and frequency with a changing climate. Given the environmental vulnerability of tropical deltas, understanding the interlinkages between population dynamics and environmental change in these regions is crucial for ensuring efficient policy planning and progress toward social and ecological sustainability. Here, we provide an overview of population trends and dynamics in the Ganges-Brahmaputra, Mekong and Amazon deltas. Using multiple data sources, including census data and Demographic and Health Surveys, a discussion regarding the components of population change is undertaken in the context of environmental factors affecting the demographic landscape of the three delta regions. We find that the demographic trends in all cases are broadly reflective of national trends, although important differences exist within and across the study areas. Moreover, all three delta regions have been experiencing shifts in population structures resulting in aging populations, the latter being most rapid in the Mekong delta. The environmental impacts on the different components of population change are important, and more extensive research is required to effectively quantify the underlying relationships. The paper concludes by discussing selected policy implications in the context of sustainable development of delta regions and beyond.

Indexed as

Amazon deltaDelta vulnerabilityGanges–Brahmaputra deltaMekong deltaPopulation change

Identifiers

PMID30174738
PMCPMC6106096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.