Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174599›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Assessing the Efficacy of Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Preferred and Alternative Second-Line Regimens in HIV-Infected Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Key Evidence to Support WHO Recommendations.

Yinqiu Huang, Xiaojie Huang, Yadong Luo, Yihong Zhou, Xingbao Tao, Hui Chen, Aixin Song, Yaokai Chen, Hao Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Future of Cervical Cancer Screening.International journal of women's health · 2024
    Review
  5. Antiviral Therapy of COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yinqiu HuangNational Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment With Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Xiaojie HuangCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yadong LuoCenter for Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Yihong ZhouCenter for Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Xingbao TaoNational Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment With Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Hui ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Aixin SongCenter for Infectious Diseases, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Yaokai ChenNational Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Treatment With Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Public Health Medical Center, Chongqing, China.
Hao WuCenter for Infectious Diseases, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNCapital Medical University · CNBeijing YouAn Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

ART-experiencedefficacy and safetyhuman immunodeficiency viruslopinavir/ritonavirsecond-line antiretroviral therapy

Identifiers

PMID30174599
PMCPMC6107847
OpenAlexW2886705643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.