Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174575›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2018

Analysis of the effect of subcutaneous injection of omental-derived cells on the healing of third degree burns in rats: a preliminary study.

F Seif, M Momeni, R Hobbenaghi, F Seif, O Mahboubi, R Babajani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F SeifDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
M MomeniAssistant Professor of General Surgery, Burn Research Centre, Iran Medical University, Tehran, Iran.
R HobbenaghiDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
F SeifDepartment of Immunology, Iran Medical University, Tehran, Iran.
O MahboubiMacmaster University, Canada.
R BabajaniLibrary And Information Sciences, Iran Medical University, Tehran, Iran.
Urmia University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injury is considered a global health issue. Third degree burn wounds do not heal spontaneously and require skin grafts. Some factors could contribute to wound healing. In this study we assessed the effect of non-fatty omental cells in burn wound healing. Similar third degree burn wounds were induced on the back of 192 rats. Forty-eight of these rats were put in a control group that did not receive any treatment. The rest of the rats were put in 3 groups, each receiving a different treatment regime. Rats in group 2 had a daily application of silver sulfadiazine; group 3 rats were injected with omental cells, and group 4 rats were injected with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) once, followed by daily application of Vaseline to the burned region. Parameters such as open epidermis length, number of epidermal cell layers, granulation tissue thickness (GTT) and neutrophil density were evaluated in each group. The average open epidermis length in the omental cell group was less than in the other groups on days 10 and 20 (P<0.05). The thickness of epidermal cell layers in the group receiving cells was greater than in the other groups on all days. On the 20th day, there was a significant difference in GTT between the four groups (P<0.05). The injection of non-fatty omental cells has a positive effect on third degree burn wounds in rats.

Indexed as

omental cellsthird degree burnwound

Identifiers

PMID30174575
PMCPMC6116647
OpenAlexW3025152179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.