ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2018
Cytosolic and Transmembrane Protein Extraction Methods of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Programmable mRNA 3'UTR engineering restores MHC-I and overcomes immune evasion in prostate cancer.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- On-Demand Proximity Labeling Using Light-Activated BioID.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Optimizing Phycocyanin Extraction from Cyanobacterial Biomass: A Comparative Study of Freeze-Thaw Cycling with Various Solvents.Marine drugs · 2024Article
- Light-activated BioID - an optically activated proximity labeling system to study protein-protein interactions.Journal of cell science · 2023Article
- An Innovative PTD-IVT-mRNA Delivery Platform for CAR Immunotherapy of ErbB(+) Solid Tumor Neoplastic Cells.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Deletion of SUMO1 attenuates behavioral and anatomical deficits by regulating autophagic activities in Huntington disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy Is a Multicellular Disease Affecting Cardiac and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterization of a Potential Ripening Regulator,Open life sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient extraction of proteins is a great challenge for numerous downstream proteomic analyses. During the protein extraction procedure, it is critical to maintain the conformational stability, integrity, as well as higher yield of the protein. To do so, 5-different lysis buffers of Tris and HEPES have been used as the primary buffering reagents with variable compositions at different concentrations and pH using human cancer cells. In this study, different protein lysates of human breast cancer cells T47D and MDA-MB-231 and ovarian cancer cell PA-1 were subjected to run SDS-PAGE for separation of proteins based on their molecular size, followed by Coomassie blue, silver staining, and immunoblot assays to compare the extraction yield of total cytoplasmic proteins, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and the integral membrane protein, integrin β-1. Our results revealed that Tris-based lysis buffer with 50 mM concentration, pH 7.5, is relatively the efficient and reliable protein extraction method for a wide range of MW subcellular markers, cytoplasmic GAPDH and transmembrane integrin β-1 proteins. We anticipate that this simple and cost-effective protein extraction protocol might be extremely useful across a broad range of subcellular proteins in different biologic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.