Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174473›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology

Intracranial Mirror Aneurysms: Anatomic Characteristics and Treatment Options.

Hyun Ho Choi, Young Dae Cho, Dong Hyun Yoo, Jeongjun Lee, Jong Hyeon Mun, Sang Joon An, Hyun-Seung Kang, Won-Sang Cho, Jeong Eun Kim, Moon Hee Han

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Hyun Ho ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Young Dae ChoDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Dong Hyun YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jeongjun LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang 10326, Korea.
Jong Hyeon MunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju 61661, Korea.
Sang Joon AnDepartment of Neurology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University of Korea College of Medicine, Incheon 22711, Korea.
Hyun-Seung KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Won-Sang ChoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jeong Eun KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Moon Hee HanDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Mirror aneurysms are generally considered as a subset of multiple aneurysms, defined as aneurysms occurring bilaterally and symmetrically on the same-named vessels. Although not infrequent, the characteristics of mirror aneurysms are not well studied. This investigation was conducted to elucidate the anatomic features of such lesions and examine treatment options. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted, aimed at 172 patients treated for 344 mirror aneurysms between January 2007 and December 2015. Aneurysms of similar nature but in asymmetric locations on the same-named vessels were excluded. All available records were examined and lesion characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes were assessed. Results: In study subjects (n = 172), mirror aneurysms most often involved middle cerebral artery bifurcation (n = 83), followed by a paraclinoid internal carotid artery (n = 50) and posterior communicating artery (n = 21). Most of the lesions (95.3%) measured ≤ 10 mm, and in 126 patients (74.6%), the size ratios were > 50%. Of the 344 aneurysms studied, coil embolization was undertaken in 217, surgical clipping in 62, and observation alone (no treatment) in 65. Coil embolization and surgical clipping were done bilaterally in 83 and 12 patients, respectively. In 12 patients, combined coiling and clipping were implemented on each side. Single-stage coil embolization of both the aneurysms was performed in 73 patients, with excellent post-procedural (85.6%) and follow-up (86.8%) occlusive results. There was no procedure-related morbidity or mortality. Conclusion: By adopting different treatment strategies to different configurations and vascular sources, mirror aneurysms can be safely and effectively treated. If feasible, single-stage coil embolization should be considered as a reasonable treatment option for mirror aneurysms.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticWound Closure TechniquesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngiographyCarotid Artery, InternalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Cerebral ArteryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAneurysmFollow-upMirrorTreatment

Identifiers

PMID30174473
PMCPMC6082764
OpenAlexW2885120340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.