Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174415›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2018

Medication adherence and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review.

Mwangi J Murage, Vanita Tongbram, Steven R Feldman, William N Malatestinic, Cynthia J Larmore, Talia M Muram, Russel T Burge, Charles Bay, Nicole Johnson, Sarah Clifford and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mwangi J MurageEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.
Vanita TongbramICON Plc, New York, NY, USA.
Steven R FeldmanWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
William N MalatestinicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.
Cynthia J LarmoreEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.
Talia M MuramEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.
Russel T BurgeEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.
Charles BayICON Plc, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole JohnsonICON Plc, New York, NY, USA.
Sarah CliffordICON Plc, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andre B AraujoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, murage_mwangi_james@lilly.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProper adherence and persistence to medications are crucial for better quality of life and improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis (PsO), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We systematically describe current adherence and persistence patterns for RA, PsO, and PsA, with a focus on biologics and identifying factors associated with adherence and persistence. PATIENTS AND

methodsUsing various databases, a systematic literature review of US-based studies published from 2000 to 2015 on medication adherence and persistence to biologics and associated factors was conducted among patients with RA, PsO, and PsA.

resultsUsing the medication possession ratio or the percentage of days covered >80%, RA and PsO adherence rates for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab ranged from 16% to 73%, 21% to 70%, and 38% to 81%, respectively. Using the criteria of a ≥45-day gap, RA persistence rates for etanercept, adalimumab, and infliximab ranged from 46% to 89%, 42% to 94%, and 41% to 76%, respectively. In PsO, persistence rates for etanercept and adalimumab ranged from 34% to 50% and 50% to 62%, respectively. Similar persistence rates were observed in PsA. Experienced biologics users showed better adherence and persistence. Younger age, female gender, higher out-of-pocket costs, greater disease severity, and more comorbidities were associated with lower adherence and persistence rates. Qualitative surveys revealed that nonpersistence was partly due to perceived ineffectiveness and safety/tolerability concerns.

conclusionBiologic adherence and persistence rates in RA, PsO, and PsA in the United States were low, with significant opportunity for improvement. Various factors - including decrease in disease severity; reduction of comorbidities; lower out-of-pocket costs; refilling at specialty pharmacies; and awareness of drug effectiveness, safety, and tolerability - can inform targeted approaches to improve these rates.

Indexed as

biologicscompliancediscontinuationfactorsnonadherencenonpersistence

Identifiers

PMID30174415
PMCPMC6110273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.