Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174389›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology

Current uses and outcomes of lumen-apposing metal stents.

Alessandro Mussetto, Alessandro Fugazza, Lorenzo Fuccio, Omero Triossi, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Gastrointestinal Fistulas-What Gastroenterologists Need to Know in 2025.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandro MussettoGastroenterology Unit, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna (Alessandro Mussetto, Omero Triossi), Italy.
Alessandro FugazzaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan (Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni), Italy.
Lorenzo FuccioDepartment of Clinical Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna (Lorenzo Fuccio), Italy.
Omero TriossiGastroenterology Unit, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna (Alessandro Mussetto, Omero Triossi), Italy.
Alessandro RepiciDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan (Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni), Italy.
Andrea AnderloniDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan (Alessandro Fugazza, Alessandro Repici, Andrea Anderloni), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is one of the revolutionary devices recently developed for gastrointestinal endoscopy. This device has a saddle-shaped design and large lumen. It was originally designed for drainage of transmural pancreatic fluid collection and in the last few years it has been used extensively for that indication. More recently, other in- and off-label indications have been proposed. Several types of LAMS are available, with or without an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system. In the current review we discuss the state of the art with regard to LAMS and their indications, usage, and outcomes.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainageendoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomyLumen-apposing metal stentspancreatic fluid collections

Identifiers

PMID30174389
PMCPMC6102456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.