Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30174188›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Local Inversion Heterozygosity Alters Recombination throughout the Genome.

K Nicole Crown, Danny E Miller, Jeff Sekelsky, R Scott Hawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polymorphic transposable elements contribute to variation in recombination landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fitness consequences of structural variation inferred from a House Finch pangenome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The deubiquitinase Usp7 inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Structural Variants and Speciation: Multiple Processes at Play.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K Nicole CrownIntegrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Danny E MillerStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA; MD-PhD Physician Scientist Training Program, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jeff SekelskyIntegrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
R Scott HawleyStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO, USA; MD-PhD Physician Scientist Training Program, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. Electronic address: rsh@stowers.org.

Funding

Mechanisms of Meiotic and Mitotic RecombinationR35GM118127 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JEFF J. SEKELSKY · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
Contributions of repair outcome choice to establishing the recombination landscape during meiosisR00GM118826 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CROWN, KIMBERLY NICOLE · 2018 to 2019
$498k
Contributions of repair outcome choice to establishing the recombination landscape during meiosisK99GM118826 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CROWN, KIMBERLY NICOLE · 2016 to 2017
$163k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM118826NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM118826NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossovers (COs) are formed during meiosis by the repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and are required for the proper segregation of chromosomes. More DSBs are made than COs, and the remaining DSBs are repaired as noncrossovers (NCOs). The distribution of recombination events along a chromosome occurs in a stereotyped pattern that is shaped by CO-promoting and CO-suppressing forces, collectively referred to as crossover patterning mechanisms. Chromosome inversions are structural aberrations that, when heterozygous, disrupt the recombination landscape by suppressing crossing over. In Drosophila species, the local suppression of COs by heterozygous inversions triggers an increase in crossing over on freely recombining chromosomes termed the interchromosomal (IC) effect [1, 2]. The molecular mechanism(s) by which heterozygous inversions suppress COs, whether noncrossover gene conversions (NCOGCs) are similarly affected, and what mediates the increase in COs in the rest of the genome remain open questions. By sequencing whole genomes of individual offspring from mothers containing heterozygous inversions, we show that, although COs are suppressed by inversions, NCOGCs occur throughout inversions at higher than wild-type frequencies. We confirm that CO frequency increases on the freely recombining chromosomes, yet CO interference remains intact. Intriguingly, NCOGCs do not increase in frequency on the freely recombining chromosomes and the total number of DSBs is approximately the same per genome. Together, our data show that heterozygous inversions change the recombination landscape by altering the relative proportions of COs and NCOGCs and suggest that DSB fate may be plastic until a CO assurance checkpoint has been satisfied.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionGenome, InsectRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCrossing Over, GeneticDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDrosophila melanogasterHeterozygoteMeiosischromosome inversionscrossing overDrosophila melanogasterinterchromosomal effectnon-crossover gene conversion

Identifiers

PMID30174188
PMCPMC6156927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.