Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173949›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2018

How should costs and cost-effectiveness be considered in prenatal genetic testing?

Teresa N Sparks, Aaron B Caughey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa N SparksDepartment of Obstetrics, Gyncecology, and Reproductive Sciences; University of California San Francisco, 550 16th St, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Aaron B CaugheyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97219, United States. Electronic address: caughey@ohsu.edu.

Funding

WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001262 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Andrea Vashti Jackson · 1998 to 2026
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In January 2017, a group of experts in prenatal genetics attended a workshop at the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine meeting to review the evidence behind the costs and cost-effectiveness of prenatal genetic testing. Over the past decade, prenatal genetic testing options have dramatically expanded to include additional options with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening, as well as increased diagnostic abilities through chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), gene panels, whole exome sequencing, and other tests. With these expanding technologies, it is important to consider the options available as well as the cost effectiveness of their use. Other important considerations are the effects of movements toward value-based health care; the role of professional societies, commercial laboratories, and insurers; disparities that exist in prenatal genetic testing; and outcomes for both patients and health care systems. Workshop participants identified key areas of research to advance our understanding of the costs and cost-effectiveness of prenatal genetic testing, which include (1) understanding the short- and long-term costs to patients and to health care systems with prenatal genetic tests; (2) elucidating the short- and long-term health outcomes for parents and children that are important to consider when comparing one testing strategy to another; (3) understanding the value underlying prenatal genetic testing to individuals and health care systems; and (4) identifying disparities in prenatal genetic testing, reasons for these disparities, and how to minimize them.

Indexed as

AneuploidyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGenetic TestingHumansInsurance, HealthPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRisk FactorsState MedicineCostCost-effectivenessDisparitiesPrenatal genetic testingValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID30173949
PMCPMC6204084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.