Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173907›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2018

Armed conflict and child mortality in Africa: a geospatial analysis.

Zachary Wagner, Sam Heft-Neal, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Robert E Black, Marshall Burke, Eran Bendavid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
34.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 187 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Zachary WagnerCenter for Population Health Sciences, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sam Heft-NealCenter on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Center of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Robert E BlackInstitute for International Programs, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marshall BurkeCenter on Food Security and the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eran BendavidCenter for Population Health Sciences, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Center for Health Policy/Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: ebd@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USAga Khan University · PKJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Trial of strategies to communicate genetic information to different ethnic and racial subpopulationsU54MD010724 · NIMHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MALDONADO, YVONNE A. · 2016 to 2021
$16.3M
Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR01DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2002 to 2017
$9.4M
Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
Big Data Analysis of HIV Risk and Epidemiology in Sub-Saharan AfricaR01AI127250 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BENDAVID, ERAN, PATEL, CHIRAG J. · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127250NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015612NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD010724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA substantial portion of child deaths in Africa take place in countries with recent history of armed conflict and political instability. However, the extent to which armed conflict is an important cause of child mortality, especially in Africa, remains unknown.

methodsWe matched child survival with proximity to armed conflict using information in the Uppsala Conflict Data Program Georeferenced Events Dataset on the location and intensity of armed conflict from 1995 to 2015 together with the location, timing, and survival of infants younger than 1 year (primary outcome) in 35 African countries. We measured the increase in mortality risk for infants exposed to armed conflicts within 50 km in the year of birth and, to study conflicts' extended health risks, up to 250 km away and 10 years before birth. We also examined the effects of conflicts of varying intensity and chronicity (conflicts lasting several years), and effect heterogeneity by residence and sex of the child. We then estimated the number and portion of deaths of infants younger than 1 year related to conflict.

findingsWe identified 15 441 armed conflict events that led to 968 444 combat-related deaths and matched these data with 1·99 million births and 133 361 infant deaths (infant mortality of 67 deaths per 1000 births) between 1995 and 2015. A child born within 50 km of an armed conflict had a risk of dying before reaching age 1 year of 5·2 per 1000 births higher than being born in the same region during periods without conflict (95% CI 3·7-6·7; a 7·7% increase above baseline). This increased risk of dying ranged from a 3·0% increase for armed conflicts with one to four deaths to a 26·7% increase for armed conflicts with more than 1000 deaths. We find evidence of increased mortality risk from an armed conflict up to 100 km away, and for 8 years after conflicts, with cumulative increase in infant mortality two to four times higher than the contemporaneous increase. In the entire continent, the number of infant deaths related to conflict from 1995 to 2015 was between 3·2 and 3·6 times the number of direct deaths from armed conflicts.

interpretationArmed conflict substantially and persistently increases infant mortality in Africa, with effect sizes on a scale with malnutrition and several times greater than existing estimates of the mortality burden of conflict. The toll of conflict on children, who are presumably not combatants, underscores the indirect toll of conflict on civilian populations, and the importance of developing interventions to address child health in areas of conflict.

fundingThe Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the Centre for Global Child Health at the Hospital for Sick Children.

Indexed as

Child MortalityInfant MortalityAfricaArmed ConflictsChildChild, PreschoolGlobal HealthHumansInfantInfant, NewbornModels, StatisticalPopulation SurveillanceRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID30173907
PMCPMC6338336
OpenAlexW2889551704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.