Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173670›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2018

Interventions for vector-borne diseases focused on housing and hygiene in urban areas: a scoping review.

Stéphanie Degroote, Kate Zinszer, Valéry Ridde

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Threat of Vector-Borne Diseases in Sierra Leone.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Generating Trust in Participatory Research onInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Selected Research Issues of Urban Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Narrative Review on Health-EDRM Primary Prevention Measures for Vector-Borne Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Neglected Urban Villages in Current Vector Surveillance System: Evidences in Guangzhou, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stéphanie DegrooteUniversity of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, Canada. stephaniedegroote.recherche@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7942-7992
Kate ZinszerUniversity of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Valéry RiddeUniversity of Montreal Public Health Research Institute, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver half the world's human populations are currently at risk from vector-borne diseases (VBDs), and the heaviest burden is borne by the world's poorest people, communities, and countries. The aim of this study was to conduct a review on VBD interventions relevant to housing and hygiene (including sanitation and waste management) in urban areas. MAIN BODY: We conducted a scoping review, which involved systematically searching peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2000 and 2016 using five scientific databases and one database for grey literature. Different data extraction tools were used for data coding and extraction. We assessed the quality of each study using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extracted descriptive characteristics and data about implementation process and transferability from all studies using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication and ASTAIRE (a tool for analyzing the transferability of health promotion interventions) tools. We reviewed 44 studies. Overall, the studies were judged to be of high risk for bias. Our results suggest multifaceted interventions, particularly community-based interventions, have the potential to achieve wider and more sustained effects than do standard vertical single-component programs. The evaluations of multifaceted interventions tend to include integrated evaluations, using not only entomological indicators but also acceptability and sustainability indicators.

conclusionsThis review highlighted the important need for higher quality research in VBDs and improved and standardized reporting of interventions. Significant research gaps were found regarding qualitative research and implementation research, and results highlighted the need for more interventions focus on sanitation and hygiene practices.

Indexed as

Infection ControlUrban HealthAnimalsDisease VectorsHealth PromotionHousingHumansHygieneInfectionsHousingHygienePreventionSanitationSystematic mixed method reviewUrban areaVector-borne diseaseWaste management

Identifiers

PMID30173670
PMCPMC6120073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.