Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173342›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2018

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Peritoneum: Current Treatment Options.

Nikolaos Vassos, Pompiliu Piso

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  18. What is the ideal management of Krukenberg syndrome?Journal of surgical case reports · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nikolaos VassosDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. nikolaos.vassos@uk-erlangen.de.
Pompiliu PisoDepartment of Surgery, Barmherzige Brüder Krankenhaus Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPeritoneal metastases (PM) are common in advanced-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients representing the second most common metastatic site of CRC. In the past, this clinical situation was treated with palliative intent. The introduction of new chemotherapeutic and targeted biologic agents has improved the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the inclusion of treatment options such as cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as inherent components of a multidisciplinary treatment was evolving for the management of these patients. Notably, the surgical approach of CRS/HIPEC has been effective offering a prolonged survival with curative intent in patients with colorectal PM. This article reviews and highlights the recent evidence of CRS and HIPEC as well as current research going on in this form of locoregional treatment in the setting of peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansHyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSurvival RateCarcinomatosisColorectal cancerCytoreductive surgeryHIPECPeritoneal metastases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.