Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173310›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2019

Brief Report: Pediatrician Perspectives Regarding Genetic Evaluations of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Audrey Rutz, Karin M Dent, Lorenzo D Botto, Paul C Young, Paul S Carbone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Audrey RutzDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Karin M DentDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Lorenzo D BottoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Paul C YoungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Paul S CarboneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. paul.carbone@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-5183
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite current guidelines, few children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) receive genetic evaluations. We surveyed Utah pediatricians to characterize the knowledge, beliefs, current practices and perceived barriers of pediatricians regarding genetic evaluation of children with ASD. We found over half lacked knowledge of current guidelines and many held beliefs about genetic evaluation that did not align with guidelines. Barriers were lack of insurance coverage for genetic evaluation/testing and long wait times to see geneticists. Pediatricians with beliefs aligned with guidelines and those aware of the role of genetic counselors were more likely to adhere to guidelines. Efforts to educate pediatricians are needed along with system level solutions regarding availability of geneticists and reimbursement for genetic testing.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAutism Spectrum DisorderChildFemaleGenetic TestingGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePediatriciansSurveys and QuestionnairesUtahAutism spectrum disorderChromosomal microarrayGeneticsPrimary care provider

Identifiers

PMID30173310
OpenAlexW2889020691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.