Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173162›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Convergent parallel mixed-methods study to understand information exchange in paediatric critical care and inform the development of safety-enhancing interventions: a protocol study.

Jessica Tomasi, Carly Warren, Lauren Kolodzey, Sonia Pinkney, Anne-Marie Guerguerian, Roxanne Kirsch, Jackie Hubbert, Christina Sperling, Patricia Sutton, Peter Laussen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jessica TomasiHumanEra, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carly WarrenHumanEra, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren KolodzeyHumanEra, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sonia PinkneyInstitute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Anne-Marie GuerguerianDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Roxanne KirschDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jackie HubbertDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christina SperlingDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia SuttonDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter LaussenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patricia TrbovichHumanEra, Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe effective exchange of clinical information is essential to high-quality patient care, especially in the critical care unit (CCU) where communication failures can have profoundly negative impacts on critically ill patients with limited physiological capacity to tolerate errors. A comprehensive systematic characterisation of information exchange within a CCU is needed to inform the development and implementation of effective, contextually appropriate interventions. The objective of this study is to characterise when, where and how healthcare providers exchange clinical information in the Department of Critical Care Medicine at The Hospital for Sick Children and explore the factors that currently facilitate or counter established best rounding practices therein. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A convergent parallel mixed-methods study design will be used to collect, analyse and interpret quantitative and qualitative data. Naturalistic observations of rounds and relevant peripheral information exchange activities will be conducted to collect time-stamped event data on workflow and communication patterns (time-motion data) and field notes. To complement observational data, the subjective perspectives of healthcare providers and patient families will be gathered through surveys and interviews. Departmental metrics will be collected to further contextualise the environment. Time-motion data will be analysed quantitatively; patterns in field note, survey and interview results will be examined based on themes identified deductively from literature and/or inductively based on the data collected (thematic analysis). The proactive triangulation of these systemic, procedural and contextual data will inform the design and implementation of efficacious interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (REB #1000059173). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will be presented to stakeholders including interdisciplinary staff, departmental management and leadership and families to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the exchange of clinical information in its current state and develop user-centred recommendations for improvement.

Indexed as

CommunicationCritical CarePatient SafetyChildClinical ProtocolsHospitals, PediatricHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care Teaminformation exchangenaturalistic observationroundsthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID30173162
PMCPMC6120652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.