Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173161›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2018

Efficacy of cloxacillin versus cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible

Charles Burdet, Paul Loubet, Vincent Le Moing, William Vindrios, Marina Esposito-Farèse, Morgane Linard, Tristan Ferry, Laurent Massias, Pierre Tattevin, Michel Wolff and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03248063 (A Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Trial Comparing Cloxacillin Versus Cefazolin Efficacy for the Treatment of Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03248063 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Trial Comparing Cloxacillin Versus Cefazolin Efficacy for the Treatment of Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2018 to 2025Enrolled315ConditionsBacteremia Due to Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus AureusArmsCloxacillin, Cefazolin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A case study onJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020
    Review
  9. Evolution of haemostatic parameters and risk of bleeding during treatment with cefazolin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Charles BurdetIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-0794
Paul LoubetIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Vincent Le MoingCHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
William VindriosHôpital Bichat Claude Bernard-Service de maladies infectieuses, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Marina Esposito-FarèseHôpital Bichat Claude Bernard-Unité de recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Morgane LinardHôpital Bichat Claude Bernard-Département d'Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Tristan FerryService de Maladies Infectieuses, Hopital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon, France.
Laurent MassiasIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Pierre TattevinService de Maladies Infectieuses et Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Michel WolffIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
François VandeneschCentre National de Références des Staphylocoques, Bron, France.
Nathalie GrallIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Caroline QuintinHôpital Bichat Claude Bernard-Unité de recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
France MentréIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
Xavier DuvalIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
François-Xavier LescureIAME, UMR 1137, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM, Paris, France.
CloCeBa study group
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre National de Recherches Météorologiques · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRHôpital Pontchaillou · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMethicillin-susceptible METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CloCeBa trial is an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in academic centres throughout France. Eligible patients are adults with MSSA bacteraemia without intravascular device or suspicion of central nervous system infection. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either cloxacillin or cefazolin by the intravenous route, for the first 14 days of therapy. The evaluation criteria is a composite criteria of negative blood cultures at day 5, survival, absence of relapse and clinical success at day 90 after randomisation. Secondary evaluation criteria include both efficacy and safety assessments. Three ancillary studies are planned to describe the epidemiology of β-lactamase encoding genes, the ecological impact and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of cefazolin and cloxacillin. Including 300 patients will provide 80% power to demonstrate the non-inferiority of cefazolin over cloxacillin, assuming 85% success rate with cloxacillin and taking into account loss-to-follow-up, with a 0.12 non-inferiority margin and a one-sided type I error of 0.025. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol received authorisation from the ethics committee Sud-Est I on 13 November 2017 (2017-87-PP)and French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (170661A-43). Results will be disseminated to the scientific community through congresses and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03248063 and 2017-003967-36.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCefazolinClinical ProtocolsCloxacillinHumansStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefazolinCloxacillinbacteremiacefazolincloxacillinefficacysafetystaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID30173161
PMCPMC6120654
OpenAlexW2888923840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.