Trial reportBMJ open2018
Efficacy of cloxacillin versus cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible
Trial report in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03248063 (A Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Trial Comparing Cloxacillin Versus Cefazolin Efficacy for the Treatment of Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Non-inferiority Randomized Trial Comparing Cloxacillin Versus Cefazolin Efficacy for the Treatment of Bacteremia Caused by Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus (MSSA)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: the long road to adequate therapy : Recent studies].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Prospective assessment of the frequency of and risk factors for bleeding events in patients treated with cefazolin.Infection · 2024Observational
- Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Review
- Current clinical practice in antibiotic treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: results from a survey in five European countries.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2022Article
- Emerging Treatment Options for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections and Bloodstream Infections Caused byInfection and drug resistance · 2022Review
- A case study onJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2020Review
- Evolution of haemostatic parameters and risk of bleeding during treatment with cefazolin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMethicillin-susceptible METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The CloCeBa trial is an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in academic centres throughout France. Eligible patients are adults with MSSA bacteraemia without intravascular device or suspicion of central nervous system infection. Patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive either cloxacillin or cefazolin by the intravenous route, for the first 14 days of therapy. The evaluation criteria is a composite criteria of negative blood cultures at day 5, survival, absence of relapse and clinical success at day 90 after randomisation. Secondary evaluation criteria include both efficacy and safety assessments. Three ancillary studies are planned to describe the epidemiology of β-lactamase encoding genes, the ecological impact and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of cefazolin and cloxacillin. Including 300 patients will provide 80% power to demonstrate the non-inferiority of cefazolin over cloxacillin, assuming 85% success rate with cloxacillin and taking into account loss-to-follow-up, with a 0.12 non-inferiority margin and a one-sided type I error of 0.025. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol received authorisation from the ethics committee Sud-Est I on 13 November 2017 (2017-87-PP)and French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products (170661A-43). Results will be disseminated to the scientific community through congresses and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03248063 and 2017-003967-36.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.