ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018
Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-Case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A single-centre experience of 21 procedures.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- A novel method of tunneling retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study.BMC urology · 2024Article
- An update of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy - Case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020Article
- Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for the resection of large size pheochromocytoma: Case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPosterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has advantages over transperitoneal technique. However many surgeons prefer the transperitoneal technique because they get a familiar and wider working space. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of the first 10 patients submitted to posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy was conducted. Data collected included: diagnosis, size, operation time, blood loss, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality, in-hospital length of stay. Compare our outcomes with worldwide bigger series, and take conclusions on the feasibility of the technique was the objective.
resultsWe included 2 pheochromocytomas, 1 giant cystic pheochromocytoma, 4 Conn's, 2 Cushing's, 1 non-functioning tumor with 4 cm. Mean operation time was 46,7 min for lesions ranging from 1,8 to 14 cm. Blood loss was negligible. One patient (10%) was converted to laparotomy because of a past clinical history of dorsal and lumbar trauma. No morbidity and no mortality. Mean hospital length of stay was 2,2 days. DISCUSSION: Mean operation time found in bigger series published in worldwide literature is 40-105,6 min. Complication rate reported ranges from 0 to 14,4%. No mortality has been ever reported. Blood loss reported in other series is 10-50 ml. The data found in our study matches other studies data. Since the same surgeon who had never performed the technique before operated all patients, makes us believe the technique is safe and feasible.
conclusionPosterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has a small learning curve. It is technically safe and feasible. More patients will be collected to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.