Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30173077›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018

Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy-Case series.

Carlos E Costa Almeida, Teresa Caroço, Marta A Silva, Miguel N Albano, João M Louro, Luis F Carvalho, Carlos M Costa Almeida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An update of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy - Case series.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos E Costa AlmeidaCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: carloscostaalmeida@yahoo.com.
Teresa CaroçoCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: tvieiracaroco@gmail.com.
Marta A SilvaCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: mafr.silva@gmail.com.
Miguel N AlbanoCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: miguelalbano@gmail.com.
João M LouroCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: joaomendeslouro@gmail.com.
Luis F CarvalhoCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: luisfcarvalho@netcabo.pt.
Carlos M Costa AlmeidaCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra (Covões), Quinta dos Vales, São Martinho de Bispo, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal. Electronic address: c.m.costa.almeida@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPosterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has advantages over transperitoneal technique. However many surgeons prefer the transperitoneal technique because they get a familiar and wider working space. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of the first 10 patients submitted to posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy was conducted. Data collected included: diagnosis, size, operation time, blood loss, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality, in-hospital length of stay. Compare our outcomes with worldwide bigger series, and take conclusions on the feasibility of the technique was the objective.

resultsWe included 2 pheochromocytomas, 1 giant cystic pheochromocytoma, 4 Conn's, 2 Cushing's, 1 non-functioning tumor with 4 cm. Mean operation time was 46,7 min for lesions ranging from 1,8 to 14 cm. Blood loss was negligible. One patient (10%) was converted to laparotomy because of a past clinical history of dorsal and lumbar trauma. No morbidity and no mortality. Mean hospital length of stay was 2,2 days. DISCUSSION: Mean operation time found in bigger series published in worldwide literature is 40-105,6 min. Complication rate reported ranges from 0 to 14,4%. No mortality has been ever reported. Blood loss reported in other series is 10-50 ml. The data found in our study matches other studies data. Since the same surgeon who had never performed the technique before operated all patients, makes us believe the technique is safe and feasible.

conclusionPosterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy has a small learning curve. It is technically safe and feasible. More patients will be collected to validate these results.

Indexed as

AdrenalAdrenalectomyMinimal invasive surgeryPosteriorRetroperitoneoscopic

Identifiers

PMID30173077
PMCPMC6122227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.