Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30172933›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2018

Engineering DNA vaccines against infectious diseases.

Jihui Lee, Shreedevi Arun Kumar, Yong Yu Jhan, Corey J Bishop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An Overview of Zika Virus and Zika Virus Induced Neuropathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Expression ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. In vivo gene delivery to immune cells.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Nanotechnology of inhalable vaccines for enhancing mucosal immunity.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024
    Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jihui LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, Emerging Technologies Building, 101 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Shreedevi Arun KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, Emerging Technologies Building, 101 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Yong Yu JhanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, Emerging Technologies Building, 101 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Corey J BishopDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, Emerging Technologies Building, 101 Bizzell St., College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: coreyjbishop@tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineering vaccine-based therapeutics for infectious diseases is highly challenging, as trial formulations are often found to be nonspecific, ineffective, thermally or hydrolytically unstable, and/or toxic. Vaccines have greatly improved the therapeutic landscape for treating infectious diseases and have significantly reduced the threat by therapeutic and preventative approaches. Furthermore, the advent of recombinant technologies has greatly facilitated growth within the vaccine realm by mitigating risks such as virulence reversion despite making the production processes more cumbersome. In addition, seroconversion can also be enhanced by recombinant technology through kinetic and nonkinetic approaches, which are discussed herein. Recombinant technologies have greatly improved both amino acid-based vaccines and DNA-based vaccines. A plateau of interest has been reached between 2001 and 2010 for the scientific community with regard to DNA vaccine endeavors. The decrease in interest may likely be attributed to difficulties in improving immunogenic properties associated with DNA vaccines, although there has been research demonstrating improvement and optimization to this end. Despite improvement, to the extent of our knowledge, there are currently no regulatory body-approved DNA vaccines for human use (four vaccines approved for animal use). This article discusses engineering DNA vaccines against infectious diseases while discussing advantages and disadvantages of each, with an emphasis on applications of these DNA vaccines. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This review paper summarizes the state of the engineered/recombinant DNA vaccine field, with a scope entailing "Engineering DNA vaccines against infectious diseases". We endeavor to emphasize recent advances, recapitulating the current state of the field. In addition to discussing DNA therapeutics that have already been clinically translated, this review also examines current research developments, and the challenges thwarting further progression. Our review covers: recombinant DNA-based subunit vaccines; internalization and processing; enhancing immune protection via adjuvants; manufacturing and engineering DNA; the safety, stability and delivery of DNA vaccines or plasmids; controlling gene expression using plasmid engineering and gene circuits; overcoming immunogenic issues; and commercial successes. We hope that this review will inspire further research in DNA vaccine development.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigen PresentationCommunicable DiseasesGenetic EngineeringHumansVaccines, DNAVaccines, SubunitAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines, DNAVaccines, SubunitDNA vaccineImmune responseInfectious diseasePlasmidsVaccine

Identifiers

PMID30172933
PMCPMC7105045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.