Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30172193›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2018

Persistent organic pollutants in fish from Charleston Harbor and tributaries, South Carolina, United States: A risk assessment.

Patricia A Fair, Natasha D White, Beth Wolf, Stephen A Arnott, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Rajendiran Karthikraj, John E Vena

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Guideline Value for Dioxin-Like Compounds in Marine Sediments.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Prenatal environmental exposures and associations with teen births.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Oestrogenic Endocrine Disruptors in the Placenta and the Fetus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Persistent Organic Pollutants in Food: Contamination Sources, Health Effects and Detection Methods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia A FairDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29412, USA; NOAA's Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Charleston, SC 29412, USA. Electronic address: fairp@musc.edu.
Natasha D WhiteNOAA's Ocean Service, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Beth WolfDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Stephen A ArnottMarine Resources Research Institute, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Kurunthachalam KannanWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Empire State Plaza, PO Box 509, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA.
Rajendiran KarthikrajWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Empire State Plaza, PO Box 509, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA.
John E VenaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29412, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USNew York State Department of Health · USNOAA National Ocean Service · USSouth Carolina Department of Natural Resources · US

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
SOUTH CAROLINA CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (SCTR)UL1RR029882 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T. · 2009 to 2011
$10.1M
Resource CoreP30AR072582 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI JAMES C OATES · 2017 to 2026
$8.5M
Patient Resource CoreP60AR062755 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI SILVER, RICHARD M. · 2012 to 2016
$5.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029882NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072582NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR062755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish consumption is an important route of exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in dolphins as well as humans. In order to assess the potential risks associated with these contaminants, 39 whole fish and 37 fillets from fish representing species consumed by dolphins and humans captured from Charleston Harbor and tributaries, South Carolina, USA, were measured for a suite of POPs. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were the predominant contaminant with concentrations ranging from 5.02 to 232.20 ng/g in whole fish and 5.42-131.95 ng/g in fillets (weight weight ww) followed by total organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). Total POPs levels varied by location and species with general trends indicating significantly higher levels in fish from the Cooper (93.4 ng/g ww) and Ashley Rivers (56.2 ng/g ww) compared to Charleston Harbor (31.6 ng/g ww). Mullet and spot were found to have significantly higher PCBs, OCPs and total POPs, 2-3 times higher than red drum; mullet were also significantly higher in OCPs compared to seatrout. PCB concentrations in whole fish and fillets exceeded EPA human screening values for cancer risk in all fish sampled. For PCBs in fillets, all samples had values of maximum allowable meals per month that were less than the EPA, FDA guidelines for recommended fish meals per month, suggesting lower (more stringent) allowable fish meals per month. All fish exceeded PBDE wildlife values and all fish except two exceeded the level where 95% of the dolphin population would have tissue levels below the health effect threshold. Considering that POP concentrations in fish potentially consumed by humans exceed human health effect thresholds levels, consumption advisories should be considered as a prudent public health measure.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedPolychlorinated BiphenylsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsFishesHalogenated Diphenyl EthersHumansRisk AssessmentSouth CarolinaUnited StatesEnvironmental PollutantsHalogenated Diphenyl EthersHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedPolychlorinated BiphenylsWater Pollutants, ChemicalCharleston HarborDolphinHuman risk assessmentMarine fishPersistent organic pollutants (POPs)

Identifiers

PMID30172193
PMCPMC6262760
OpenAlexW2885361766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.