Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171861›Full record

ReviewChest2019

The Septic Heart: Current Understanding of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.

Lukas Martin, Matthias Derwall, Sura Al Zoubi, Elisabeth Zechendorf, Daniel A Reuter, Chris Thiemermann, Tobias Schuerholz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chest, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 201 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
201citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

201 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 338 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Therapeutical progress in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review

141 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukas MartinDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: lmartin@ukaachen.de.
Matthias DerwallDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Sura Al ZoubiWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom.
Elisabeth ZechendorfDepartment of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel A ReuterDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Chris ThiemermannWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, United Kingdom.
Tobias SchuerholzDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEWilliam Harvey Research Institute · GBUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Septic cardiomyopathy is a key feature of sepsis-associated cardiovascular failure. Despite the lack of consistent diagnostic criteria, patients typically exhibit ventricular dilatation, reduced ventricular contractility, and/or both right and left ventricular dysfunction with a reduced response to volume infusion. Although there is solid evidence that the presence of septic cardiomyopathy is a relevant contributor to organ dysfunction and an important factor in the already complicated therapeutic management of patients with sepsis, there are still several questions to be asked: Which factors/mechanisms cause a cardiac dysfunction associated with sepsis? How do we diagnose septic cardiomyopathy? How do we treat septic cardiomyopathy? How does septic cardiomyopathy influence the long-term outcome of the patient? Each of these questions is interrelated, and the answers require a profound understanding of the underlying pathophysiology that involves a complex mix of systemic factors and molecular, metabolic, and structural changes of the cardiomyocyte. The afterload-related cardiac performance, together with speckle-tracking echocardiography, could provide methods to improve the diagnostic accuracy and guide therapeutic strategies in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. Because there are no specific/causal therapeutics for the treatment of septic cardiomyopathy, the current guidelines for the treatment of septic shock represent the cornerstone of septic cardiomyopathy therapy. This review provides an up-to-date overview of the current understanding of the pathophysiology, summarizes the evidence of currently available diagnostic tools and treatment options, and highlights the importance of further urgently needed studies aimed at improving diagnosis and investigating novel therapeutic targets for septic cardiomyopathy.

Indexed as

CardiomyopathiesHumansSepsiscardiomyopathyechocardiographysepsis

Identifiers

PMID30171861
OpenAlexW2889367571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.