Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171843›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2019

Zika virus and the nonmicrocephalic fetus: why we should still worry.

Christie L Walker, Marie-Térèse E Little, Justin A Roby, Blair Armistead, Michael Gale, Lakshmi Rajagopal, Branden R Nelson, Noah Ehinger, Brittney Mason, Unzila Nayeri and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Editorial: Translational Virology in Pregnancy.Frontiers in virology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Zika Virus Infection of PregnantJournal of virology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christie L WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Marie-Térèse E LittleFourth Dimension Biomedical and Research Consulting, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Justin A RobyCenter for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, Department of Immunology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Blair ArmisteadDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Michael GaleCenter for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, Departments of Immunology, Microbiology, and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Lakshmi RajagopalCenter for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Branden R NelsonCenter for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
Noah EhingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Brittney MasonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Unzila NayeriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Christine L CurryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Kristina M Adams WaldorfDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Center for Innate Immunity and Immune Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg Sweden. Electronic address: adamsk@uw.edu.

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
West Nile Virus and host control of innate defensesU19AI083019 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GALE, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2018
$22.5M
Role of the hyaluronidase in GBS VirulenceR01AI133976 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADAMS WALDORF, KRISTINA M., RAJAGOPAL, LAKSHMI · 2017 to 2021
$4.5M
GBS mediated in utero fetal injuryR01AI100989 · NIAID · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI ADAMS WALDORF, KRISTINA M., RAJAGOPAL, LAKSHMI · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Innate Immune Control of West Nile VirusR01AI104002 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DIAMOND, MICHAEL S, GALE, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
New transgenic tools for mammalian fibrosis and regenerative repair researchR21OD023838 · OD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MILLEN, KATHLEEN JOYCE, NELSON, BRANDEN R · 2017 to 2018
$504k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI100989NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104002NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI133976NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI083019NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIH HHS R21 OD023838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zika virus is a mosquito-transmitted flavivirus and was first linked to congenital microcephaly caused by a large outbreak in northeastern Brazil. Although the Zika virus epidemic is now in decline, pregnancies in large parts of the Americas remain at risk because of ongoing transmission and the potential for new outbreaks. This review presents why Zika virus is still a complex and worrisome public health problem with an expanding spectrum of birth defects and how Zika virus and related viruses evade the immune response to injure the fetus. Recent reports indicate that the spectrum of fetal brain and other anomalies associated with Zika virus exposure is broader and more complex than microcephaly alone and includes subtle fetal brain and ocular injuries; thus, the ability to prenatally diagnose fetal injury associated with Zika virus infection remains limited. New studies indicate that Zika virus imparts disproportionate effects on fetal growth with an unusual femur-sparing profile, potentially providing a new approach to identify viral injury to the fetus. Studies to determine the limitations of prenatal and postnatal testing for detection of Zika virus-associated birth defects and long-term neurocognitive deficits are needed to better guide women with a possible infectious exposure. It is also imperative that we investigate why the Zika virus is so adept at infecting the placenta and the fetal brain to better predict other viruses with similar capabilities that may give rise to new epidemics. The efficiency with which the Zika virus evades the early immune response to enable infection of the mother, placenta, and fetus is likely critical for understanding why the infection may either be fulminant or limited. Furthermore, studies suggest that several emerging and related viruses may also cause birth defects, including West Nile virus, which is endemic in many parts of the United States. With mosquito-borne diseases increasing worldwide, there remains an urgent need to better understand the pathogenesis of the Zika virus and related viruses to protect pregnancies and child health.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfant, NewbornMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceRisk AssessmentUnited StatesZika Virus Infectionbirth defectCongenital Zika SyndromemicrocephalypregnancyZika virus

Identifiers

PMID30171843
PMCPMC6501788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.