ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2019
Reproducibility of native T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective Study of Multiparametric Renal MRI for CKD Progression (AFiRM).Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Intra- and interobserver variability in renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging, arterial spin labeling, blood oxygen level-dependent and renal artery flow measurements utilizing manual segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Multiparametric MR Imaging for Evaluating Renal Function and Microstructure.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of multiparametric MRI and clinical indicators for renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Observer Variability of Cortical T1 Mapping for Renal Tissue Characterization.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Article
- Native TiScience · 2024Article
- Native TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Renal Assessment in Acute Cardiorenal Syndrome.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- NativeBiosensors · 2021Article
- Rapid BRadiology · 2021Article
- Cardiorenal Syndrome: Emerging Role of Medical Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test-Retest Repeatability Study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
- Consensus-based technical recommendations for clinical translation of renal T1 and T2 mapping MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Clinical application and technical considerations of TThe British journal of radiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced renal disease is characterized by adverse changes in renal structure; however, noninvasive techniques to diagnose and monitor these changes are currently lacking. PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of native T STUDY TYPE: Reproducibility study. POPULATION: Fifteen healthy volunteers (mean age 31 years, range 19-63 years), and 11 patients with diabetic nephropathy (mean age 57 years, range 51-69 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T, modified Look-Locker imaging (MOLLI) 5(3)3. ASSESSMENT: Intra- and interexamination reproducibility of voxel-based T STATISTICAL TESTS: Reproducibility was evaluated using Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
resultsIntra- and interexamination reproducibility of renal native T DATA
conclusionRenal native T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:588-596.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.