Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171589›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2018

Could Intensive Blood Pressure Control Really Reduce Diabetic Retinopathy Outcomes? Evidence from Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Jian-Bo Zhou, Zhi-Hui Song, Lu Bai, Xiao-Rong Zhu, Hong-Bing Li, Jin-Kui Yang

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jian-Bo ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Jianbo.zhou@foxmail.com.
Zhi-Hui SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lu BaiDepartment of Geriatrics, Beijing Haidian Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Rong ZhuDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hong-Bing LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jin-Kui YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. jinkuiyang@yeah.net.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Haidian Hospital · CNBeijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospital's Youth Programme QML20170204National Science Foundation Council of China 81670738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo explore the accumulated evidence concerning the effect of intensive blood pressure control on the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and macular edema (ME).

methodsA number of electronic databases were searched including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, conferences and proceedings. Randomized controlled trials comparing intensive blood pressure targets with conventional blood pressure targets in patients with type 2 diabetes were included. The definition of intensive versus conventional blood pressure targets was from the pertinent original studies. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized trials were analyzed in STATA.

resultsEight trials randomizing 6989 patients were assessed and reviewed in full text; 3749 vs. 3240 were in each arm (intensive vs. conventional). All trials had a low risk of bias. Intensive blood pressure control supported a 17% reduction in the incidence of DR (relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.72-0.95). Trial sequential analyses confirmed that sufficient evidence indicated a relative risk reduction above 17% for the incidence of DR when intensive blood pressure control was targeted. Heterogeneity was absent (I

conclusionIntensive blood pressure control reduced the relative risk of incidence of DR by 17%. The available data were insufficient to prove or refute a relative risk reduction for the progression of DR or incidence of PDR and ME at a magnitude of 15%.

Indexed as

Diabetic retinopathyIntensive blood pressure controlTrial sequential analysis

Identifiers

PMID30171589
PMCPMC6167290
OpenAlexW2889068013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.