Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171489›Full record

Trial reportThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2019

Structured physiotherapy including a work place intervention for patients with neck and/or back pain in primary care: an economic evaluation.

Sanjib Saha, Birgitta Grahn, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Kjerstin Stigmar, Sara Holmberg, Johan Jarl

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02609750 (WorkUp. Early Structured Care Including Workplace Interventions to Improve Work Ability in Patients With Neck and/or Back Pain. A Prospective Pare Wise Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care With One Year Follow up), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02609750 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

WorkUp. Early Structured Care Including Workplace Interventions to Improve Work Ability in Patients With Neck and/or Back Pain. A Prospective Pare Wise Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Primary Care With One Year Follow up

TypeinterventionalSponsorLund UniversityRan2013 to 2025Enrolled364ConditionsBack Pain, Neck PainArmsStructured care & workplace intervention, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sanjib SahaHealth Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö), Lund University, Medicon Village, Scheelevägen 2, 22381, Lund, Sweden. sanjib.saha@med.lu.se.
Birgitta GrahnDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulf-G GerdthamHealth Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö), Lund University, Medicon Village, Scheelevägen 2, 22381, Lund, Sweden.
Kjerstin StigmarDepartment of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sara HolmbergDepartment of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Växjo, Sweden.
Johan JarlHealth Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Science (Malmö), Lund University, Medicon Village, Scheelevägen 2, 22381, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Government Grant for Clinical Research ALFGovernment Grant for Clinical Research Dnr F:2014/354Vårdalstiftelsen REHSAMVårdalstiftelsen RF11-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cluster-randomized controlled trial, WorkUp, was conducted for working-aged patients at risk of sick leave or on short-term sick leave due to acute/subacute neck and/or back pain in Sweden. The purpose of WorkUp was to facilitate participants to stay at work or in case of sick leave, return-to-work. The aim of this study was to study whether the WorkUp trial was cost-effective. Patients in the intervention and reference group received structured evidence-based physiotherapy, while patients in the intervention group also received a work place dialogue with the employer as an add-on. The participants, 352 in total, were recruited from 20 physiotherapeutic units in primary healthcare in southern Sweden. The economic evaluation was performed both from a healthcare and a societal perspective with a 12-month time frame with extensive univariate sensitivity analyses. Results were presented as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) with outcomes measured as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and proportion working for at least 4 weeks in a row without reported sick leave at 12-month follow-up. From the healthcare perspective, the ICER was €23,606 (2013 price year) per QALY gain. From the societal perspective the intervention was dominating, i.e.. less costly and more effective than reference care. Bootstrap analysis showed that the probability of the intervention to be cost-effective at €50,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY was 85% from the societal perspective. Structured evidence-based physiotherapeutic care together with workplace dialogue is a cost-effective alternative from both a societal and a healthcare perspective for acute/subacute neck and/or back pain patients.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02609750.

Indexed as

AdultBack PainCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainPatient SatisfactionPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrimary Health CareQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRecovery of FunctionReturn to WorkSick LeaveSwedenCost–effectiveness analysisCost–utility analysisMusculoskeletal painQuality-adjusted life-yearsReturn-to-work

Identifiers

PMID30171489
PMCPMC6438933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.