Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171459›Full record

ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2019

Occupational and Hand Dermatitis: a Practical Approach.

Heather P Lampel, Helen B Powell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Challenges in diagnosing occupational allergic contact dermatitis: a case report.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Hand Eczema in Apprentice Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic after a Skin Prevention Program.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact in Contact Dermatitis during and after SARS-CoV2 Pandemic.Current treatment options in allergy · 2022
    Review
  11. Contact Dermatitis: Classifications and Management.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather P LampelSona Dermatology, 9104 Falls of Neuse Rd, Suite 310, Raleigh, NC, 27615, USA. drheatherlampel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-4869
Helen B PowellUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, 321 S Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC, 27516, USA.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational skin disease is common. It affects workers more often than reported. Contact dermatitis, both irritant and allergic, accounts for the majority of occupational skin diagnoses. Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) frequently affects the hands and may have a profound impact on an employee's ability to perform a job. Severe OCD can affect a worker's activities of daily living and can even lead to job loss. Numerous irritants have been described in the workplace, from the common (wet work) to the more obscure (warm, dry air). Several contact allergens may be work-related, and the majority of established occupational allergens are also known nonoccupational allergens. Emerging occupational allergens are continually described in the literature. Patch testing is the gold standard for the workup of allergic contact dermatitis. Patch testing in the setting of OCD may require extended or unique allergen trays, as well as a thorough occupational history and collection of workplace Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). These MSDS contain valuable information but may not be complete or accurate. Proof of occupational causation can be aided by employing the Mathias criteria. Certain industries and occupations are associated with higher rates of OCD, and as expected, the industries with direct contact with irritants and allergens are highly represented. The differential diagnosis for occupational dermatitis is broad and should be considered when evaluating an employee with suspected OCD. Some other diagnoses to consider include atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, and manifestations of internal disease, as well as an overlap syndrome of more than one diagnosis. OCD treatment should ideally follow the public health hazard controls' stepwise approach. Prevention and early intervention are key to promoting occupational health and preventing OCD. Multidisciplinary teams have been successful in the treatment of OCD, and newly described topical treatments may provide additional modalities for use in the occupational setting.

Indexed as

AllergensComorbidityDermatitis, Allergic ContactDermatitis, OccupationalDiagnosis, DifferentialGlobal HealthHand DermatosesHumansImmunityOccupational ExposurePatch TestsPhenotypeSocial ChangeAllergensAllergenContact dermatitisHandIrritantOccupational

Identifiers

PMID30171459
OpenAlexW2889063444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.