ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018
Intracochlear Sound Pressure Measurements in Normal Human Temporal Bones During Bone Conduction Stimulation.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of Promontory Vibration and Sound Emission Recorded from the Skin Surface in Bone Conduction Stimulation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Experimental Framework for the Setup and Validation of Individualized Bone Conduction Hearing Computational Models.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A mechanical lumped-element model of the human middle ear for bone conduction hearing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bone conduction stimulation efficiency at coupling locations closer to the cochlea.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Directional sensitivity of bone conduction stimulation on the otic capsule in a finite element model of the human temporal bone.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Objective preclinical measures for bone conduction implants.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Measurements of bone-conducted sound in the chinchilla external ear.Hearing research · 2024Article
- The Impact of Location and Device Coupling on the Performance of the Osia System Actuator.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Bone-conduction hyperacusis induced by superior canal dehiscence in human: the underlying mechanism.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Investigation of Mechanisms in Bone Conduction Hyperacusis With Third Window Pathologies Based on Model Predictions.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- A Comparison of Intracochlear Pressures During Ipsilateral and Contralateral Stimulation With a Bone Conduction Implant.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bone conduction (BC) is heavily relied upon in the diagnosis and treatment of hearing loss, but is poorly understood. For example, the relative importance and frequency dependence of various identified BC sound transmission mechanisms that contribute to activate the cochlear partition remain unknown. Recently, we have developed techniques in fresh human cadaveric specimens to directly measure scalae pressures with micro-fiberoptic sensors, enabling us to monitor the input pressure drive across the cochlear partition that triggers the cochlear traveling wave during air conduction (AC) and round-window stimulation. However, BC stimulation poses challenges that can result in inaccurate intracochlear pressure measurements. Therefore, we have developed a new technique described here that allows for precise measurements during BC. Using this new technique, we found that BC stimulation resulted in pressure in scala vestibuli that was significantly higher in magnitude than in scala tympani for most frequencies, such that the differential pressure across the partition-the input pressure drive-was similar to scala vestibuli pressure. BC (stimulated by a Bone Anchored Hearing Aid [Baha]) showed that the mechanisms of sound transmission in BC differ from AC, and also showed the limitations of the Baha bandwidth. Certain kinematic measurements were generally proportional to the cochlear pressure input drive: for AC, velocity of the stapes, and for BC, low-frequency acceleration and high-frequency velocity of the cochlear promontory. Therefore, our data show that to estimate cochlear input drive in normal ears during AC, stapes velocity is a good measure. During BC, cochlear input drive can be estimated for low frequencies by promontory acceleration (though variable across ears), and for high frequencies by promontory velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.