Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171345›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2019

Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

Isabel Cristina Olegário, Daniela Hesse, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Clarissa Calil Bonifácio, Daniela Prócida Raggio

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02217098 (The Survival Rate of Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Carbomer Cement and Compomer in Occlusal and Proximal ART Restorations), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02217098 nacompletednot on this map

The Survival Rate of Glass Ionomer Cement, Glass Carbomer Cement and Compomer in Occlusal and Proximal ART Restorations

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniela Prócida RaggioRan2014 to 2018Enrolled530ConditionsCaries Involving Multiple Surfaces of Tooth, Dental Caries on Chewing Surface of Tooth, Dental Caries Extending Into DentineArmsGIC Restorations, Carbomer Restorations, Compomer Restorations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Isabel Cristina OlegárioDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela HesseDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fausto Medeiros MendesDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Clarissa Calil BonifácioDepartment of Cariology, Endodontics and Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniela Prócida RaggioDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. danielar@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0048-2068
Universidade de São Paulo · BRAcademic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306304/2015-5Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309521/2015-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/11236-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/00565-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC), compomer (COM), and glass carbomer (CAR) for occlusal and occlusoproximal cavitated dentin caries lesions in primary molars.

methodsA total of 568 4-7-year-old children (287 occlusoproximal and 281 occlusal cavities) were selected in Barueri, Brazil. The patients were randomly allocated in three groups: GIC, COM, and CAR. All treatments were performed on school setting following ART premises. Evaluations were performed after 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for testing association with clinical factors (α = 5%).

resultsThe overall survival rate after 3 years of occlusal ART restorations was 73% (GIC = 83%; COM = 78%; CAR = 62%) and 49% for occlusoproximal ART restorations (GIC = 56%; COM = 56%; CAR = 36%). CAR restorations were less successful than GIC and COM for both occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations (p < 0.05). No difference was found between GIC and COM (p > 0.05).

conclusionsGIC and compomer are clinically more successful than CAR for occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations in primary molars. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Both compomer and high viscosity glass ionomer cement are suitable materials for ART in primary molars. However, glass carbomer cement should not be used for ART (#NCT02217098).

Indexed as

ApatitesCompomersDental Atraumatic Restorative TreatmentGlass Ionomer CementsAcrylic ResinsBrazilChildDental CariesDental Restoration FailureDental Restoration, PermanentHumansAcrylic ResinsApatitescarbomerCompomersglass carbomer cementGlass Ionomer CementsAtraumatic restorative treatmentCompomerGlass carbomerGlass ionomer cementPrimary teeth

Identifiers

PMID30171345
OpenAlexW2889223051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.