Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171334›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Hanna Gyllensten, Ingalill Koinberg, Eric Carlström, Lars-Eric Olsson, Elisabeth Hansson Olofsson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02982746 (Can a Person-centred-care Intervention Improve Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02982746 nacompletednot on this map

Can a Person-centred-care Intervention Improve Health-related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled96ConditionsHealth Related Quality of LifeArmsgPCC (Gothenburg Person Centred Care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-medical interventions to enhance return to work for people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of person-centred care for patients with acute coronary syndrome.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Centredness in health care: A systematic overview of reviews.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Review
  12. Commentary: how person-centred is pharmaceutical care?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna GyllenstenCentre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.gyllensten@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6890-5162
Ingalill KoinbergCentre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eric CarlströmCentre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lars-Eric OlssonCentre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Elisabeth Hansson OlofssonCentre for Person-centred Care (GPCC), University of Gothenburg, Box 457, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Centre for Person-Centred Care (GPCC) Not applicablethe Regional Health Technology Assessment Centre, Region Västra Götaland Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHead and neck cancer and its treatment deteriorate quality of life, but symptoms improve with person-centred care. We examined the cost-effectiveness of a person-centred care intervention versus standard medical care.

methodsIn this randomized clinical trial of a person-centred intervention, patients were planned for outpatient oncology treatment in a Swedish university hospital between 2012 and 2014 and were followed during 1 year. Annual healthcare costs were identified from medical records and administrative register data. Productivity costs were calculated from reported sick leave. Health-related quality of life was collected using the EuroQol Group's five-dimension health state questionnaire.

resultsCharacteristics were similar between 53 patients in the intervention group and 39 control patients. The average total cost was Euro (EUR) 55,544 (95% confidence interval: EUR 48,474-62,614) in the intervention group and EUR 57,443 (EUR 48,607-66,279) among controls, with similar health-related quality of life.

conclusionsThis person-centred intervention did not result in increased costs and dominated the standard medical care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02982746).

Indexed as

AgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareQuality of LifeSelf CareSick LeaveSwedenHead and neck neoplasmsHealth care costsPatient care managementPerson-centred careRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30171334
PMCPMC6449490
OpenAlexW2888792633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.