ReviewPlanta2018
Microspore embryogenesis in Brassica: calcium signaling, epigenetic modification, and programmed cell death.
Review in Planta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- From pollen precursor to totipotent embryo: a model system for plant cell developmental plasticity.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Integrative modeling of cold and light signaling in tomato: unraveling the transcriptional network governing cold acclimation.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Article
- Molecular Insights into Microspore Embryogenesis: Transcriptomic Dynamics in Barley and Wheat.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- The Epigenetic Regulation of Agronomic Traits and Environmental Adaptability in Brassicas.Plant, cell & environment · 2025Review
- In vitro- and in vivo-based approaches for doubled haploid production in Zea mays L.: challenges and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Epigenetic odyssey to decrypt the hidden code for sustainable brassica production: enhancing yield, stress resilience and nutritional quality.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- The Resistance of Oilseed Rape Microspore-Derived Embryos to Osmotic Stress Is Associated With the Accumulation of Energy Metabolism Proteins, Redox Homeostasis, Higher Abscisic Acid, and Cytokinin Contents.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- In vitro androgenesis: spontaneous vs. artificial genome doubling and characterization of regenerants.Plant cell reports · 2020Review
- Article
- Utilization of in Vitro Anther Culture in Spelt Wheat Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionStress induction followed by excessive calcium influx causes multiple changes in microspores resulting in chromatin remodeling, epigenetic modifications, and removal of unwanted gametophytic components via autophagy, switching microspores towards ME. In Brassica, isolated microspores that are placed under specific external stresses can switch their default developmental pathway towards an embryogenic state. Microspore embryogenesis is a unique system that speeds up breeding programs and, in the context of developmental biology, provides an excellent tool for embryogenesis to be investigated in greater detail. The last few years have provided ample evidence that has allowed Brassica researchers to markedly increase their understanding of the molecular and sub-cellular changes underlying this process. We review recent advances in this field, focusing mainly on the perception to inductive stresses, signal transduction, molecular and structural alterations, and the involvement of programmed cell death at the onset of embryogenic induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30171331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.