ReviewDer Anaesthesist2018
[When A is not A anymore: problems and pitfalls with blood group typing].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The development of a legal framework for blood donation and blood safety in China over 24 years.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- [The patient blood group-the small but important difference].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Correct blood group typing is a prerequisite for transfusion. In most cases blood group determination is without problems; however, in individual cases various factors can complicate blood group determination and sometimes lead to confusing findings. For a better understanding the clinician should have basic knowledge of blood typing. Blood group determination usually covers the AB0 blood groups, Rhesus and Kell systems; in addition, a direct Coombs test and an antibody screening test for the detection of irregular antibodies in the recipient are performed. Confusion of patients, blood samples, results or preparations can lead to severe consequences due to incompatible transfusion and must be prevented. In this context, bedside blood type testing before transfusion is of utmost importance. Problems in laboratory analysis as well as patient-related factors, such as the existence of irregular antibodies against red blood cells can complicate the immunohematology diagnostics. Certain medications, such as daratumumab, lead to a significantly increased complexity in laboratory analyses. Massive transfusions can lead to chimerism with more than one population of circulating red blood cells. Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation can also lead to a change in blood groups as well as chimerism. In addition, there are various other rare causes that can result in difficulties in blood group determination, such as rare blood groups or rare disease-associated phenomena. In the case of problems in blood group determination, early and close cooperation with transfusion medicine is essential for the clinician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.