ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018
Sodium-fluoride PET-CT for the non-invasive evaluation of coronary plaques in symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease: a cross-correlation study with intravascular ultrasound.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Correlation ofArchives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- Emerging PET Tracers in Cardiac Molecular Imaging.Cardiology and therapy · 2023Review
- Simultaneous assessment of microcalcifications and morphological criteria of vulnerability in carotid artery plaque using hybridJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Update on imaging in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: promising role of functional imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2022Review
- Carotid plaque inflammatory activity assessed by 2-[18F]FDG-PET imaging decrease after a neurological thromboembolic event.EJNMMI research · 2021Article
- An Update on [Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2020Review
- Relationship between coronary arterialEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Atherosclerosis imaging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Review
- Quantifying skeletal burden in fibrous dysplasia using sodium fluoride PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Network Medicine: A Clinical Approach for Precision Medicine and Personalized Therapy in Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2020Review
- Association between atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score estimated by pooled cohort equation and coronary plaque burden as assessed by NaF-PET/CT.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Comparison of atherosclerotic burden in non-lower extremity arteries in patients with and without peripheral artery disease usingAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Coronary Artery Microcalcification: Imaging and Clinical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- NaF uptake in unstable plaque: what does fluoride uptake mean?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the
background
methodsForty-four patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease were included in this prospective controlled trial, 32 of them (30 patients with unstable angina and 2 patients with stable angina), representing the final study cohort, got additional IVUS. All patients underwent cardiac
resultsSignificantly increased
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.