Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171232›Full record

ArticleNature methods2018

Detecting repeated cancer evolution from multi-region tumor sequencing data.

Giulio Caravagna, Ylenia Giarratano, Daniele Ramazzotti, Ian Tomlinson, Trevor A Graham, Guido Sanguinetti, Andrea Sottoriva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inferring and summarizing tumor phylogenies from bulk DNA data.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giulio CaravagnaEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. giulio.caravagna@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4240-3265
Ylenia GiarratanoSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1301-0879
Daniele RamazzottiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ian TomlinsonInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-1470
Trevor A GrahamCentre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9582-1597
Guido SanguinettiSchool of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. gsanguin@inf.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6663-8336
Andrea SottorivaEvolutionary Genomics and Modelling Lab, Centre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. andrea.sottoriva@icr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6709-9533

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16459Cancer Research UK 19771Cancer Research UK 22909Cancer Research UK A19771Cancer Research UK A22909European Research Council 306999Wellcome Trust 202778SOTTORIVA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent successions of genomic changes, both within and between patients, reflect repeated evolutionary processes that are valuable for the anticipation of cancer progression. Multi-region sequencing allows the temporal order of some genomic changes in a tumor to be inferred, but the robust identification of repeated evolution across patients remains a challenge. We developed a machine-learning method based on transfer learning that allowed us to overcome the stochastic effects of cancer evolution and noise in data and identified hidden evolutionary patterns in cancer cohorts. When applied to multi-region sequencing datasets from lung, breast, renal, and colorectal cancer (768 samples from 178 patients), our method detected repeated evolutionary trajectories in subgroups of patients, which were reproduced in single-sample cohorts (n = 2,935). Our method provides a means of classifying patients on the basis of how their tumor evolved, with implications for the anticipation of disease progression.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMachine LearningNeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID30171232
PMCPMC6380470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.