ReviewPediatrics2018
In Search of Consistency: Scandinavian Approaches to Resuscitation of Extremely Preterm Infants.
Review in Pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are guidelines needed? International perspectives on decision-making and practice variation in the care of extremely preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Debate: Should Parents be able to Request Non-Resuscitation for All Extremely Premature Newborn Infants?Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Ethical considerations regarding the treatment of extremely preterm infants at the limit of viability: a comprehensive review.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
- Perinatal death in the Nordic countries in relation to gestational age: The impact of registration practice.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Neonatologists' preferences regarding guidelines for periviable deliveries: do we really know what we want?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Guidelines around the resuscitation of extremely preterm infants have been developed, in part, to ensure consistency in decision-making between hospitals and health professionals. However, such guidelines can also be used to highlight other forms of inconsistency: between countries and between practices in different areas of medicine. In this article, we highlight the ethical advantages (and disadvantages) of consistency. We argue that an internationally uniform approach to ethically complex decisions is neither likely nor desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.