Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171092›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Differentiating between Models of Perceptual Decision Making Using Pupil Size Inferred Confidence.

Katsuhisa Kawaguchi, Stephane Clery, Paria Pourriahi, Lenka Seillier, Ralf M Haefner, Hendrikje Nienborg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensory and Choice Responses in MT Distinct from Motion Encoding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Altered Excitation-Inhibition Balance on Decision Making in a Cortical Circuit Model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Binocular disparity-based learning is retinotopically specific and independent of sleep.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katsuhisa KawaguchiGraduate School of Neural and Behavioural Sciences, International Max Planck Research School, 72074 Tuebingen, Germany.
Stephane CleryUniversity of Tuebingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany, and.
Paria PourriahiUniversity of Tuebingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany, and.
Lenka SeillierUniversity of Tuebingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany, and.
Ralf M HaefnerBrain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627.ORCID 0000-0002-5031-0379
Hendrikje NienborgUniversity of Tuebingen, Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany, and hnienb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2167-7251
Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DEUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

CRCNS: The neural basis of probabilistic inference in the visual systemR01EY028811 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAEFNER, RALF MANFRED · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During perceptual decisions, subjects often rely more strongly on early, rather than late, sensory evidence, even in tasks when both are equally informative about the correct decision. This early psychophysical weighting has been explained by an integration-to-bound decision process, in which the stimulus is ignored after the accumulated evidence reaches a certain bound, or confidence level. Here, we derive predictions about how the average temporal weighting of the evidence depends on a subject's decision confidence in this model. To test these predictions empirically, we devised a method to infer decision confidence from pupil size in 2 male monkeys performing a disparity discrimination task. Our animals' data confirmed the integration-to-bound predictions, with different internal decision bounds and different levels of correlation between pupil size and decision confidence accounting for differences between animals. However, the data were less compatible with two alternative accounts for early psychophysical weighting: attractor dynamics either within the decision area or due to feedback to sensory areas, or a feedforward account due to neuronal response adaptation. This approach also opens the door to using confidence more broadly when studying the neural basis of decision making.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsArousalDecision MakingDiscrimination, PsychologicalMacaca mulattaMaleModels, PsychologicalPsychophysicsPupilVisual Perceptionconfidenceintegration-to-boundmacaqueperceptual decision makingpsychophysical reverse correlationpupillometry

Identifiers

PMID30171092
PMCPMC6596089
OpenAlexW2889156686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.