Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171069›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2018

The SCF

Srinadh Choppara, Sankaran Ganga, Rajeshkumar Manne, Parul Dutta, Shailza Singh, Manas Kumar Santra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Srinadh ChopparaFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and.
Sankaran GangaFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and.
Rajeshkumar ManneFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and.
Parul DuttaFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and.
Shailza SinghFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and.
Manas Kumar SantraFrom the National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex and manas@nccs.res.in.
National Centre for Cell Science · INSavitribai Phule Pune University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor suppressor F-box protein 31 (FBXO31) is indispensable for maintaining genomic stability. Its levels drastically increase following DNA damage, leading to cyclin D1 and MDM2 degradation and G

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceF-Box ProteinsGenomic InstabilityHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPhosphorylationProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitinationF-Box ProteinsFBXO31 protein, humanProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexSKP Cullin F-Box Protein LigasesTumor Suppressor ProteinsATMcell cycleDNA damageE3 ubiquitin ligaseF-box proteinflow cytometrypost-transcriptional regulationpost-translational modification (PTM)protein motifprotein turnoversenescenceubiquitinationubiquitin ligaseubiquitylation (ubiquitination)

Identifiers

PMID30171069
PMCPMC6200945
OpenAlexW2892235463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.