Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30171067›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Kathleen Van Asten, Laurence Slembrouck, Siel Olbrecht, Lynn Jongen, Olivier Brouckaert, Hans Wildiers, Giuseppe Floris, Erik Van Limbergen, Caroline Weltens, Ann Smeets and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Menopausal status-dependent alterations in the transcript levels of genes encoding ERα, ERβ, PR and HER2 in breast tumors with different receptor status.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in Taiwanese breast cancer patients: factors influencing local relapse risk and disease-free survival.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Kathleen Van AstenDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laurence SlembrouckDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4138-7630
Siel OlbrechtDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Lynn JongenDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier BrouckaertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Senology, Jan Yperman Hospital, Ypres, Belgium.
Hans WildiersDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-7837
Giuseppe FlorisLaboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Erik Van LimbergenDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Caroline WeltensDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ann SmeetsDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robert ParidaensDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anita Giobbie-HurderDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Meredith M ReganDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Giuseppe VialeDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Beat ThürlimannBreast Center St. Gallen, Cantonal Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Ignace VergoteDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Evangelia ChristodoulouDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ben Van CalsterDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick NevenDepartment of Oncology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium patrick.neven@uzleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BEDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USSwiss Group For Clinical Cancer Research · CHUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative breast cancers, the progesterone receptor (PR) is an independent prognostic marker. Little is known about the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade. We assessed this in two independent datasets. PATIENTS AND

methodsWomen with primary operable, invasive ER+ HER-2 negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, treated at University Hospitals Leuven, were included. We assessed the association of PR status and subtype (grade 1-2 vs. grade 3) with distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and breast cancer-specific survival. The interaction between PR status and subtype was investigated, and associations of PR status by subtype were calculated. The BIG 1-98 data set was used for validation.

resultsIn total, 4,228 patients from Leuven and 5,419 from BIG 1-98 were analyzed. In the Leuven cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PR-positive versus PR-negative tumors for DRFI was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.89). For the interaction with subtype (

conclusionPR positivity may be more protective against metastatic relapse in luminal B-like versus luminal A-like breast cancer, but no strong conclusions can be made. In absolute risk, results suggest an absent PR is clinically more important in high compared with low proliferative ER+ HER-2 negative tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An absent progesterone receptor (PR) predicts a worse outcome in women treated for an estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. As low proliferative tumors lacking PR are now also classified high risk, the prognostic value of PR across risk groups was studied. Despite a negative test for interaction of the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade, the magnitude of an absent PR on breast cancer relapse is much larger in high than in low proliferative breast cancers.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansPrognosisReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival AnalysisReceptors, ProgesteroneAgeBreast cancerLuminalProgesterone receptorPrognostic valueSubtype

Identifiers

PMID30171067
PMCPMC6369957
OpenAlexW2888876774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.