Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170853›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018

High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Anoop S V Shah, Atul Anand, Fiona E Strachan, Amy V Ferry, Kuan Ken Lee, Andrew R Chapman, Dennis Sandeman, Catherine L Stables, Philip D Adamson, Jack P M Andrews and 23 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
28.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01852123 nacompletednot on this map

High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2013 to 2017Enrolled48,282ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial InfarctionArmsHigh-sensitivity troponin I assay
NCT05748691 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Trial of Switching High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis (TWITCH-ED Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2020 to 2023Enrolled26,000ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Acute Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial InjuryArmsClinical implementation of hs-cTnT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Anoop S V ShahBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Atul AnandBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Fiona E StrachanBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Amy V FerryBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kuan Ken LeeBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew R ChapmanBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Dennis SandemanDepartment of Cardiology, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, UK.
Catherine L StablesBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Philip D AdamsonBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jack P M AndrewsBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Mohamed S AnwarBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
John HungBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alistair J MossBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel O'BrienEmergency Medicine Research Group of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Colin BerryInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Iain FindlayDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Paisley, UK.
Simon WalkerDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Anne CruickshankDepartment of Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Alan ReidDepartment of Biochemistry, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Alasdair GrayEmergency Medicine Research Group of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Paul O CollinsonDepartment of Clinical Blood Sciences and Department of Cardiology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust and St George's University of London, London, UK.
Fred S AppleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
David A McAllisterInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Donogh MaguireEmergency Medicine Department, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Keith A A FoxBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher TuckEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ronald HarkessEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Richard A ParkerEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Catriona KeerieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher J WeirEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicholas L MillsBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: nick.mills@ed.ac.uk.
High-STEACS Investigators
University of Edinburgh · GBBritish Heart Foundation · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBQueen Elizabeth University Hospital · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBGlasgow Royal Infirmary · GBHennepin County Medical Center · USRoyal Alexandra Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GBVictoria Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/14/32023British Heart Foundation FS/16/75/32533British Heart Foundation FS/17/51/33096British Heart Foundation FS/18/25/33454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays permit use of lower thresholds for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, but whether this improves clinical outcomes is unknown. We aimed to determine whether the introduction of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay with a sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold would reduce subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

methodsIn this stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial across ten secondary or tertiary care hospitals in Scotland, we evaluated the implementation of an hs-cTnI assay in consecutive patients who had been admitted to the hospitals' emergency departments with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they presented with suspected acute coronary syndrome and had paired cardiac troponin measurements from the standard care and trial assays. During a validation phase of 6-12 months, results from the hs-cTnI assay were concealed from the attending clinician, and a contemporary cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay was used to guide care. Hospitals were randomly allocated to early (n=5 hospitals) or late (n=5 hospitals) implementation, in which the high-sensitivity assay and sex-specific 99th centile diagnostic threshold was introduced immediately after the 6-month validation phase or was deferred for a further 6 months. Patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay were defined as those with an increased hs-cTnI concentration in whom cTnI concentrations were below the diagnostic threshold on the contemporary assay. The primary outcome was subsequent myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular causes at 1 year after initial presentation. Outcomes were compared in patients reclassified by the high-sensitivity assay before and after its implementation by use of an adjusted generalised linear mixed model. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01852123.

findingsBetween June 10, 2013, and March 3, 2016, we enrolled 48 282 consecutive patients (61 [SD 17] years, 47% women) of whom 10 360 (21%) patients had cTnI concentrations greater than those of the 99th centile of the normal range of values, who were identified by the contemporary assay or the high-sensitivity assay. The high-sensitivity assay reclassified 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction who were not identified by the contemporary assay. In those reclassified, subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death within 1 year occurred in 105 (15%) of 720 patients in the validation phase and 131 (12%) of 1051 patients in the implementation phase (adjusted odds ratio for implementation vs validation phase 1·10, 95% CI 0·75 to 1·61; p=0·620).

interpretationUse of a high-sensitivity assay prompted reclassification of 1771 (17%) of 10 360 patients with myocardial injury or infarction, but was not associated with a lower subsequent incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death at 1 year. Our findings question whether the diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction should be based on the 99th centile derived from a normal reference population.

fundingThe British Heart Foundation.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPredictive Value of TestsTroponin IBiomarkersTroponin I

Identifiers

PMID30170853
PMCPMC6137538
OpenAlexW2889023120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.