ArticleJournal of biomechanics2018
Effect of guided bone regeneration on bone quality surrounding dental implants.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of catalpol on osteogenic differentiation of the jaw bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells on the basis of network pharmacology, molecular docking and experimental validation.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Stability of alveolar ridge following horizontal guided bone regeneration after implant loading for 1 -2 years: a retrospective comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Role of Guided Bone Regeneration in Enhancing Dental Implant Success : Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- Enhanced Bone Formation by Rapidly Formed Bony Wall over the Bone Defect Using Dual Growth Factors.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Guide bone regeneration (GBR) reconstruction of extensive alveolar bone defect due to infected radicular cyst enucleation: 2 case reports.International journal of surgery case reports · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Characteristics and Analysis Approaches of Bone and Bone Substitute Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Improving Bone Formation by Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Collagen Membrane with rhBMP-2: A Novel Concept.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Effect of Polylactic Acid Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration in Anterior Maxillary Implantation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- In vitro evaluation of crosslinked bovine pericardium as potential scaffold for the oral cavity.Bio-medical materials and engineering · 2023Article
- Efficacy of bone grafts in jaw cystic lesions: A systematic review.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Influence of the bone graft materials used for guided bone regeneration on subsequent peri-implant inflammation: an experimental ligature-induced peri-implantitis model in Beagle dogs.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Article
- Effects of Yunnan Baiyao on the Differentiation of HPDLFs on the Bio-OssInternational journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- In vitro Cell Proliferation Assay of Demineralized Dentin Material Membrane in Osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 Cells.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Bone quality as well as its quantity at the implant interface is responsible for determining stability of the implant system. The objective of this study is to examine the nanoindentation based elastic modulus (E) at different bone regions adjacent to titanium dental implants with guided bone regeneration (GBR) treated with DBM and BMP-2 during different post-implantation periods. Six adult male beagle dogs were used to create circumferential defects with buccal bone removal at each implantation site of mandibles. The implant systems were randomly assigned to only GBR (control), GBR with demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and GBR with DBM + recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) (BMP) groups. Three animals were sacrificed at each 4 and 8 weeks of post-implantation healing periods. Following buccolingual dissection, the E values were assessed at the defects (Defect), interfacial bone tissue adjacent to the implant (Interface), and pre-existing bone tissue away from the implant (Pre-existing). The E values of BMP group had significantly higher than control and DBM groups for interface and defect regions at 4 weeks of post-implantation period and for the defect region at 8 weeks (p < 0.043). DBM group had higher E values than control group only for the defect region at 4 weeks (p < 0.001). The current results indicate that treatment of rhBMP-2 with GBR accelerates bone tissue mineralization for longer healing period because the GBR likely facilitates a microenvironment to provide more metabolites with open space of the defect region surrounding the implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.