Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170652›Full record

ReviewIndian heart journal

Coronary chronic total occlusion intervention: A pathophysiological perspective.

Debabrata Dash

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Debabrata DashThumbay Hospital, Ajman, United Arab Emirates; Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China. Electronic address: dr.debabrata@thumbayhospital.ae.
Thumbay Group (United Arab Emirates) · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) is the last frontier in coronary intervention. PCI of CTO carries multiple advantages, such as significant improvement in symptoms, improvement in abnormal wall motion and left ventricular function and, possibly, increased long-term survival. As of today the procedural success is markedly improved because of technical innovations and is limited to highly experienced operators. To enhance the overall success rate from a worldwide perspective, a thorough understanding of its pathophysiology is critical to further development of newer techniques and technologies. In this review, the author outlines in-depth the evidence that underpins our understanding of CTO pathophysiology and its insight into CTO intervention that incorporates various steps and techniques to cross the lesion.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionRegistriesChronic DiseaseCoronary AngiographyGlobal HealthHumansIncidencePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRisk FactorsChronic total occlusionPathophysiologyPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID30170652
PMCPMC6116719
OpenAlexW2784066321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.