Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30170610›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model.

Katherine Cullerton, Timothy Donnet, Amanda Lee, Danielle Gallegos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Placement poverty: Why it matters to all dietitians.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Research roadmap for ultra-processed foods in the context of the Australian food system.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Article
  11. Public Narratives About Food Security Policies for Remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Twenty years of behavioral nutrition- A reflection on the road less travelled.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  15. Mobilizing for Health: A Case Study of Kazakhstan's Vaping Ban Advocacy Campaign.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  16. The role of advocacy and policy in advancing global neurosurgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine CullertonSchool of Public Health, University of Queensland, Wyndham St, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. k.cullerton@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9517-6380
Timothy DonnetQueensland University of Technology, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Amanda LeeThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, The Sax Institute, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Danielle GallegosSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Kelvin Grove, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council Post graduate scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influencing public policy change can be difficult and complex, particularly for those with limited power and resources. For any one issue there may be several groups, including the commercial sector and public health advocates advocating from different policy perspectives. However, much of the public health advocacy literature and tools available for those wanting to improve their practice is based on research from one specific perspective of an issue. This approach deprives advocates of potential insight into the most effective levers for this complex and difficult process. To provide a more comprehensive insight into effective levers for influencing public health policy change, a conceptual model for poorly-resourced advocates was developed. The model was developed through the integration and synthesis of policy process and network theories with the results from three studies conducted previously by the authors: a systematic literature review; a social network analysis of influential actors in Australian nutrition policy; plus in-depth interviews with a sample of these actors who had diverse perspectives on influencing nutrition policy. Through understanding the key steps in this model advocates will be better equipped to increase political and public will, and affect positive policy change.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationGovernmentNutrition PolicyPolicy MakingPower, PsychologicalPublic HealthAustraliaCommerceConcept FormationHealth PolicyHumansPoliticsStakeholder ParticipationAdvocacyNutritionPolicyPolicy makingPolitical willPublic health

Identifiers

PMID30170610
PMCPMC6119246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.